Figure 3.

Summary of image quality assessment for PDFF and R2* maps. More than half of the PDFF maps were rated as “good image quality.” Although poor quality was seen more often in PDFF maps with respiratory-gated methods, the image quality scores were not significantly different (P = 1.000). Similarly, poor-quality R2* maps were more common with respiratory-gating methods than breath-hold methods, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.359–1.000).