Table 3.
BH vs. BL | BL vs. NV | NV vs. BH | |
---|---|---|---|
Anterior lobe | |||
Correlation coefficient [95% CI] | 0.841 [0.731–0.908] | 0.8376 [0.726–0.906] | 0.963 [0.935–0.979] |
Mean difference [90% CI] (s−1) | −0.39 [−1.88–1.09] | −0.41 [−2.14–1.31] | 0.80 [−1.07–2.69] |
P value for equivalent test | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Posterior lobe | |||
Correlation coefficient [95% CI] | 0.708 [0.526–0.828] | 0.621 [0.403–0.772] | 0.939 [0.893–0.965] |
Mean difference [90% CI] (s−1) | 0.32 [−1.06–1.70] | −1.83 [−4.54–0.88] | 1.51 [−0.31–3.33] |
P value for equivalent test | <0.001 | <0.028 | 0.001 |
Lateral lobe | |||
Correlation coefficient [95% CI] | 0.894 [0.816–0.940] | 0.868 [0.774–0.925] | 0.955 [0.922–0.974] |
Mean difference [90% CI] (s−1) | 1.30 [–0.55–3.17] | −1.81 [−4.28–0.67] | 0.50 [−1.67–2.68] |
P value for equivalent test | <0.001 | <0.018 | <0.001 |
Difference is shown as mean (standard deviation). Two one-sided paired t-test is used to show “equality” of the results from each sequence, ie: P < 0.05 suggests no more than 5 s−1 difference in R2* measurements between the paired sequences. Confidence interval (CI) is shown as 90% CI, because one-sided t-test with alpha of 0.05 was done twice for both sides.