. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 2.

Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul 1;66(10):1035–1042. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400358

Table 1.

Participant demographic information

	Total (N=50)		CA-CBT (N = 27)		CBT (N = 23)

Characteristic	N	%	N	%	N	%	Value	df	p^a
Female	36	72	19	70	17	74	.08	1	.781
Age in years (M±SD)	45.2±11.5		44.8±10.7		45.7±12.6		.26	48	.795
Family annual income (M±SD)	11123±17656		12605±21730		9994±12471		.51	46	.616
Unemployed/SSDI	24	48	14	52	10	44	.35	1	.555
No H.S. Diploma	22	44	11	41	11	48	.25	1	.615
Marital status							.87	2	.650
Never Married	6	12	4	15	2	9
Married & live with partner	19	38	11	41	8	35
Divorced or separated or widowed	25	50	12	44	13	57
Foreign Born	48	96	25	93	23	100			^b
Generational status									^b
1st Generation	48	96	25	93	23	100
2nd Generation	1	2	1	4	0	0
3rd Generation	1	2	1	4	0	0
Years in US (M±SD)	15.5±9.2		17.7±9.1		12.9±8.8		1.89	48	.065
Age of immigration (M±SD)	29.4±10.0		27.3±10.3		32.0±9.1		1.69	48	.097
Language used in therapy									^b
Cantonese	36	72	22	82	14	61
English	2	4	2	7	0	0
Mandarin	12	24	3	11	9	39
On antidepressant at baseline	7	14	3	11	4	17	.41	1	.542
On antidepressant during study	23	46	12	44	11	48	.06	1	.811
Baseline HDRS (M±SD)	25.9±6.1		27.3±5.7		24.3±6.3		1.76	48	.084
Clinic							3.70	2	.157
RAMS AFI	15	30	11	17	4	41
RAMS Outpatient	26	52	11	65	15	51
APFC Calworks	9	18	5	17	4	19

Based on chi-square or t-test depending on whether the variable was continuous our categorical.

All variables did not show any statistically significant difference between CA-CBT and CBT.

Language used in therapy, place of birth, and generational status could not be tested because of the minimal variability in frequencies (i.e., a value of zero in some cells).