Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 1;37(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40902-015-0033-1

Table 4.

The downward-canted (right) and upward-canted (left) distance discrepancies of Orb-Mx, Po-Mx, and EAM-Mx

Discrepancies Group I Group II-A Group II-B p value
Vertical Orb-Mx 0.70 ± 0.45 0.60 ± 0.36 3.72 ± 1.47 <0.001
Po-Mx 0.46 ± 1.89 1.19 ± 2.56 3.85 ± 2.53 <0.001
EAM-Mx 0.45 ± 1.90 1.20 ± 1.70 2.93 ± 2.35 <0.001
p value Orb-Mx vs. Po-Mx 0.530 0.472 0.718
Orb-Mx vs. EAM-Mx 0.538 0.284 0.026*
Po-Mx vs. EAM-Mx 0.985 0.981 0.001*
Horizontal Fro-Mx 0.33 ± 1.68 −1.93 ± 4.02 −0.08 ± 3.01 0.086
Po-Mx 0.37 ± 2.51 −1.82 ± 4.26 −0.71 ± 3.24 0.166
EAM-Mx 0.46 ± 2.66 −2.09 ± 4.22 −0.03 ± 2.67 0.057
p value Fro-Mx vs. Po-Mx 0.938 0.872 0.290
Fro-Mx vs. EAM-Mx 0.837 0.785 0.909
Po-Mx vs. EAM-Mx 0.876 0.633 0.110

Mean ± standard deviation, mm, One way ANOVA and paired t-test

Mx maxillary 1st molar tip, Po porion, EAM external auditory meatus, Orb orbital plane, Fro frontal plane, * denotes statistical difference (p < 0.05)