Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Theriogenology. 2015 Jul 29;84(8):1411–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.028

Table 2.

Embryo development rates for Control, siNull and siSETDB1 injected embryos. The number of embryos either cleaving to the 2-cell stage, or developing to the blastocyst stage were counted and used to generate a one-way ANOVA model in order to determine differences between treatment groups. Groups displaying different superscript letters were considered to be different (p < 0.05).

Treatment n Cleaved % Cleavage Blastocysts % Blastocysts
CNTL 189 162 85.7 ± 2.2%a 85 44.9 ± 4.9%a
NULL 283 222 78.4 ± 6.9%a 73 25.7 ± 6.0%b
siSETDB1 361 308 85.3 ± 2.8%a 0 0%c