Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2015 Jul 28;32(10):709–719. doi: 10.1002/da.22395

TABLE 3.

Maternal experience of childhood abuse and offspring’s persistent high depressive symptoms across adolescence and young adulthood, Nurses’ Health Study II and Growing Up Today Study, N mothers = 6,692 N offspring = 8,108 N observations (offspring) = 34,302a

N offspring Risk ratio (95% CI)
Model 1: adjusted for demographic variables Model 2: Model 1, further adjusted for maternal mental health indicators Model 3: Model 2, further adjusted for adolescent socioeconomic status and family structure Model 4: Model 3, further adjusted for offspring’s experience of abuse
Maternal experience of childhood abuse
0: no abuse 2,102 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
1 1,850 1.42 (0.90, 2.23) 1.33 (0.85, 2.10) 1.34 (0.85, 2.12) 1.36 (0.85, 2.17)
2 1,591 1.80 (1.16, 2.78)c 1.59 (1.03, 2.47)b 1.60 (1.03, 2.48)b 1.41 (0.90, 2.23)
3 1,553 2.43 (1.60, 3.69)d 2.07 (1.36, 3.15)d 2.04 (1.33, 3.11)d 1.85(1.18, 2.90)c
4 635 2.04 (1.22, 3.44)c 1.72 (1.01, 2.91)b 1.73 (1.02, 2.92)b 1.28 (0.71, 2.29)
5: severe abuse 377 2.47 (1.37, 4.44)c 1.92 (1.05, 3.54)b 1.85 (0.99, 3.43)b 1.44 (0.76, 2.70)
a

Models 1, 2, and 3 include the same participants; the stated N mothers, N offspring, and N observations applies. Model 4 is restricted to offspring with childhood abuse data; results for Model 1 in this subsample were similar to those in the whole sample (RR range = 1.51, 2.55, RR severe abuse = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.37, 4.76). All models adjusted for offspring’s age, sex, and race/ethnicity, and maternal childhood socioeconomic status. Risk ratios were estimated using generalized estimating equations with a log link and a Poisson distribution, using SAS PROC GENMOD. The sample for this table was restricted to offspring with three or more waves of data on depressive symptoms.

b

P < .05.

c

P < .01.

d

P < .001.