Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2015 Aug 20;168(0):223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.014

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical and performance characteristics of study participants

Control
Subjects
(CON)
Schizophrenia
Patients
(SCZ)
Bipolar
Patients (BP)
ADHD
Patients
(ADHD)
Statistic Patterna

M SD M SD M SD M SD p
Demographic
Age (yrs) 31.34 8.47 35.84 8.61 35.29 9.03 32.91 10.67 F(3,1250) = 8.25 p<.001 C<B**; C<S***
Gender (%male) 46.7% 75.9% 57.1% 52.2% X2(3)= 20.537 p<.001 S>A; S>B; S>C
Education 15.02 2.01 12.66 1.84 14.55 1.96 14.61 1.73 F(3,1250) = 26.58 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Maternal Education 13.09 3.88 12.33 2.87 13.67 3.44 14.50 2.49 F(3,1229) = 3.12 p=.025 S<A*
Paternal Education 13.72 4.26 13.04 3.74 15.13 3.64 14.67 2.80 F(3.1194) = 2.85 p=.036 S<B(ns)
Ethnicity (%hispanic) 40.7% 58.6% 26.5% 15.2% X2(3)= 24.067 p<.001 S>C>A,B
Clinical Rating Scales
Hamilton Depressionb n/a 15.45 11.5 18.11 13.01 10.78 7.25 F(2,144)=5.28 p=.006 A<B**
BPRS n/a 52.74 14.98 44.81 11.05 38.02 7.31 F(2,147)=19.90 p<.001 S>A***,S>B**, B>A*
SAPS n/a 32.16 22.32 7.17 8.41 n/a F(1,82)=44.36 p<.001
SANS n/a 38.24 24.09 20.05 13.12 n/a F(1,85)=18.76 p<.001
Neuropsychological Performance (Raw score)
CVLT 55.62 9.23 40.62 10.07 51.49 11.17 54.74 8.74 F(3, 1249)=38.11 p<.001 S<A,B,C***, B<C*
Visual Reproduction I 37.53 4.79 31.98 8.22 35.86 5.03 36.96 5.59 F(3,1249)=19.24 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Visual Reproduction II 31.40 8.21 22.95 10.98 27.31 10.17 29.63 9.04 F(3,1249)=15.22 p<.001 S<A,C***, S<B*, B<C**
Symbol Spanc 24.31 6.36 17.00 6.14 21.96 6.46 22.37 6.94 F(3,1247)=19.62 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Digit Span 29.47 6.02 22.93 5.17 28.37 6.11 29.13 4.70 F(3,1249)=20.93 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Letter-Number Sequencing 20.47 3.17 17.47 3.24 19.80 2.69 19.93 2.61 F(3,1249)=15.02 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Vocabulary 41.16 9.83 31.16 10.46 42.59 9.85 43.07 9.72 F(3,1249)=19.84 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Matrix Reasoning 19.59 4.27 15.26 5.22 19.22 4.41 20.39 3.76 F(3,1249)=16.70 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Color Trails 1 34.24 12.75 43.31 19.47 35.16 11.05 35.41 12.24 F(3,1248)=6.93 p<.001 S<C***,S<B**, S<A*
Color Trail 2 66.88 20.41 88.17 27.54 70.86 17.97 69.63 20.92 F(3,1249)=15.47 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Memory Performance (d-prime)
Remember-Know 1.77 .70 1.19 .83 1.47 .77 1.70 .71 F(3,1127)=10.59 p<.001 S<A,B,C***, B<C*
Scene Recognition 2.37 .72 1.72 .78 2.29 .69 2.43 .72 F(3,1247)=13.91 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Spatial Capacity 2.60 .69 1.92 .89 2.42 .70 2.35 .84 F(3,1130)=16.59 p<.001 S<C***, S<B**, S<A*
Verbal Capacity 2.41 .67 1.80 .88 2.06 .59 2.36 .73 F(3,1131)=12.58 p<.001 S<A,C***, B<C**
Spatial Maintenance 2.43 1.08 1.52 1.32 2.16 1.05 2.21 1.29 F(3,1246)=12.26 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Spatial Manipulation 1.54 1.01 1.19 .98 1.42 1.13 1.43 1.05 F(3,1247)=2.17 p=.090
Verbal Maintenance 3.28 1.25 1.81 1.32 3.02 1.35 3.02 1.33 F(3,1246)=20.29 p<.001 S<A,B,C***
Verbal Manipulationd 2.41 1.41 1.14 1.22 1.78 1.40 2.19 1.29 F(3,1246)=13.16 p<.001 S<A,B,C***, B<C*

Mean and standard deviation for each group on demographic, clinical and behavioral testing measures. Statistical tests reported are those with age and gender as a covariate. For the neuropsychological test battery the primary metric used was the total raw score for each measure. True positive, false positive, true negative and false negative scores were calculated for the computer based memory performance measures and the primary metric used for this study was d-prime.

a

For tests where there was a main effect of group, post-hoc contrasts using Tukey’s HSD were performed. A=ADHD, B=BP, C=CON, S=SCZ. Only significant differences are reported (*** p<.001;** p<.01; *p<.05).

b

There was a main effect of group on Hamilton Depression score. Tukey’s HSD indicate lower depression scores for ADHD compared to BP (p=.005) and a trend towards lower depression scores for ADHD compared to SCZ (p=.087)

c

There was a main effect of group on SSP performance. Tukey’s HSD indicate worse performance for SCZ than CON, ADHD, and BP (all p<.001). There were no other significant group differences though there was a trend towards worse performance for BP than CON (p=.056)

d

There was a main effect of group on VMNM manipulation performance. Tukey’s HSD indicate worse performance for SCZ than CON and ADHD (p<.001). BP also demonstrated worse performance than CON (p=.012). There was a trend towards worse performance for SCZ than BP (p=.092).