Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;3:e1275. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1275

Table 3. Correlations between OP scale, SF-36 and Cantril Ladder at baseline and between changes in these scores after one year.

OP Baseline (n ranged from 175 to 181) Δ OP (n ranged from 124 to 130)
Life satisfaction Baseline −.561 (p < 0.001)
BMI Baseline .186 (p = 0.012)
SF-36
PCS Baseline −.410 (p < 0.001)
MCS Baseline −.624 (p < 0.001)
Physical function −.321 (p < 0.001)
Physical role function −.268 (p < 0.001)
Bodily pain −.299 (p < 0.001)
General health −.367 (p < 0.001)
Vitality −.460 (p < 0.001)
Social function −.582 (p < 0.001)
Emotional role function −.373 (p < 0.001)
Mental health −.570 (p < 0.001)
Δ Life satisfaction −.394 (p < 0.001)
Δ BMI −.280 (p < 0.001)
Δ SF-36
Δ PCS −.248 (p = 0.006)
Δ MCS −.339 (p < 0.001)
Δ Physical function −.266 (p = 0.002)
Δ Physical role function −.091 (p = 0.306)
Δ Bodily pain −.193 (p = 0.028)
Δ General health −.229 (p = 0.009)
Δ Vitality −.255 (p = 0.004)
Δ Social function −.328 (p < 0.001)
Δ Emotional role function −.221 (p = 0.013)
Δ Mental health −.250 (p = 0.004)

Notes.

Δ
change
SD
standard deviation
PCS
physical component summary
MCS
mental component summary

Since a higher score on the OP scale indicates poorer psychosocial functioning, the correlation between change in OP scale and change in SF-36 and Cantril Ladder is negative.

Data are given as Pearson’s r correlation coefficients. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.