Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2015 Apr 18;80:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.009

Table 2.

The effects of reported smoking status on likelihood of attending even one session at a cardiac rehabilitation program.

Author Year Location n sex Effect
Direction
Size of Effect Smoking Definition
Turk-Adawi et
al.
2014 Wisconsin, USA 6,874 69% M *− Smokers less likely to attend (AOR)
0.59
Smoked in last 12 months
Kotseva et al. 2013 76 centres in
Europe
3,950 77% M * − 33.3% of non-attenders smoked vs.
28.1% of attenders
Smoked in month prior to event
Goel et al. 2011 Minnesota, USA 2,395 68% M * − Current smokers less likely to attend
(OR 0.68)
Current smoker, no definition, but
distinct from former
Weingarten et
al.
2011 Minnesota, USA 450 66% M * − Current smoking predictive of failure
to enroll (AOR 3.38)
Current smoker based on hospital
record
Taylor et al. 2001 Bristol, UK 187 79% M * − Current smokers less likely to attend
(AOR 0.39)
Still smoking at discharge
Kotseva et al. 2004 47 centres in
Europe
2,382 78% M 22.4% of non-attenders smoked vs.
18.7% of attenders
Smoked in month prior to event
Ades, Huang et
al.
1992 Vermont, USA 580 87% M 38% of non-attenders smoked vs. 14%
of attenders
Reported current smoking while in
hospital
Tzou et al. 2004 Wisconsin, USA 630 Unknown 30.5% of non-attenders smoked vs.
13.6% of attenders
Smoked in last 12 months
Deskur-
Smielecka et al.
2009 Poland 70 73% M −, p = .052 None of those who continued
smoking attended
Continued smoking after event
Redfern et al. 2007 Sydney, Australia 446 76% M 21% non-attenders smoked vs. 1% of
attenders
Current, self-report confirmed by CO
Kerins et al. 2011 Dublin, Ireland 268 72% M 37% non-attenders smoked vs. 10% of
attenders
Self-reported "smoker"
Fontana et al. 1986 Connecticut, USA 95 100% M Smokers half as likely to attend Smoked in last 6 months
Lindsay et al. 2003 Glasgow, UK 183 Unknown 43% non-attenders smoked vs. 14% of
attenders
Current smoker at time of event
Lane et al. 2001 London, UK 263 75% M *= Current smoking not significantly
associated with attendance (OR 0.80)
Current at time of hospitalization
Harlan et al. 1995 North Carolina,
USA
393 76% M *= Only non-attenders reported any
daily smoking
Current cigarettes per day
Higgins et al. 2008 Melbourne,
Australia
184 78% M *= 13% non-attenders smoked vs. 8% of
attenders
Current smoker, no definition but
distinct from former
Ayala et al. 2003 19 states and DC,
USA
720 63% M *= 24.5% non-attenders smoked vs.
19.3% of attenders
Current smoker, no definition but
distinct from former
Blackburn et al. 2000 Ohio, USA 3,331 70% M *= 19% non-attenders smoked vs. 16% of
attenders
Current smoker, from clinical record
Pasquali et al. 2003 North Carolina,
USA
700 64% M *= 61.1% non-attenders smoked vs.
57.0% of attenders
"History of smoking"
Cooper et al. 1999 London, UK 137 77% M *= Equal percent of never smokers in
attenders and non-attenders (27%)
Past, present or never smoker
Dunlay et al. 2009 Minnesota, USA 179 66% M *= 17.2% non-attenders smoked vs.
21.7% of attenders
Current smoking from hospital record
Grace et al. 2007 Ontario, Canada 506 77% M *= Current smoking not significantly
associated with attendance (OR 1.36)
Current smoking after event
Grace et al. 2008 Ontario, Canada 1,490 72% M *= 7.8% non-attenders smoked vs. 8.6%
of attenders
Smoking in last 3 months
Farley et al. 2003 Adelaide,
Australia
165 71% M *= No difference in attendance for
smokers (OR 0.96)
Combined current and former
smokers
King et al. 2001 Western Canada 304 76% M *= Smoking status not significantly
associated with attendance (OR 0.67)
Smoked in last 3 months
Whitmarsh et
al.
2003 UK 93 80% M *= 58% of non-attenders smoked vs. 65%
of attenders
Smoked prior to MI - may combine
recent quitters with distant quitters
Evenson et al. 1998 Minnesota, USA 2,150 63% M *= Smoking rates similar in attenders
(35%) and non-attenders (34%)
Current smoker, no definition but
distinct from former
Salamonson et
al.
2007 New South Wales,
Australia
106 73% M = 16% non-attenders smoked vs. 6% of
attenders
Current at time of hospitalization
Ramm et al. 2001 Auckland, NZ 324 74% M = Data not provided Smoking status at admission to
hospital
Fridlund et al. 2000 Sweden 240 0% M = 23% non-attenders smoked vs. 24% of
attenders
Smoking: yes/no? Not defined
Beauchamp et
al.
2013 Melbourne,
Australia
544 73% M = Smoking rates similar in attenders
(23%) and non-attenders (22%)
Currently smokes at least the
occasional cigarette
King et al. 1999 Western Canada 1,245 77% M *+, criterion
not
specified
Current smokers more likely to attend
(OR 1.51)
Smoked in last 3 months
Witt et al. 2004 Minnesota, USA 1,821 58% M *+ Current smokers more likely to attend
(OR 2.22)
"Current smoker" - no definition

Note: Significance is defined as the original author’s determination of statistical significance. A criterion of p < .05 was used across all studies unless specifically noted otherwise. A + denotes a significant positive association, an = denotes no significant relationship and a − denotes a significant negative association. An * denotes studies using multivariate analyses that accounted for other common predictors of attendance such as age, gender and qualifying diagnoses.