Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2015 Jul 6;121(20):3676–3683. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29561

Table 4.

Sensitivity analyses: Disparities in CRC mortality between individuals aged 50 years and older in Louisiana and New Jersey in 2009, under alternative model assumptions.

Lower quality endoscopies Residual survival difference Same survival and stage distribution Survival corrected for background mortality
Scenario ASR % reduction* Excess rate ASR % reduction Excess rate* ASR % reduction* Excess rate ASR % reduction* Excess rate
New Jersey, observed 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8
Louisiana, observed 61.9 6.1 61.9 6.1 61.9 6.1 61.9
 -if risk factors of New Jersey 60.2 2.7% 4.4 60.1 3.0% 4.3 60.1 3.0% 4.3 60.0 3.0% 4.2
 -if screening of New Jersey 56.1 9.3% 0.3 55.2 10.8% -0.6 55.2 10.8% -0.6 54.6 11.7% -1.2
 -if survival of New Jersey 50.7 18.1% -5.1 53.6 13.3% -2.2 50.8 17.9% -5.0 53.4 13.7% -2.4
 -if risk factors, screening and survival of New Jersey 45.3 26.8% -10.5 47.0 24.0% -8.8 44.6 27.9% -11.2 46.4 25.0% -9.4

ASR, Age-standardized rate per 100,000 individuals (2000 US standard population).

*

Percent reduction, compared to the mortality rate observed in Louisiana.

Excess CRC mortality rate in Louisiana compared to New Jersey