1 |
One or more regulated products according to approved or labeled uses
|
Clinical trial comparing atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin according to labeled population and dose(s)
Clinical trial comparing functional and anatomic evaluation of patients with chest pain
|
Some labels are highly specific, which may result in a restrictive study population
Likely to be low risk to study subjects
In the case of devices, FDA regulations are not triggered unless safety and effectiveness are being evaluated
Describes situations that would be encountered in clinical practice
|
2 |
One or more regulated products NOT according to label but according to standard of care
|
Study involving the use of hydralazine in heart failure
Study evaluating coronary stents in acute myocardial infarction
Study involving the use of amiodarone to treat atrial fibrillation
|
Risk profile of the product generally well understood
Risk may vary according to the level of evidence supporting the “standard of care” ranging from low to high (amiodarone, apixaban)
Professional guidelines are frequently discordant with product labels/approved use
“Standard of care” may be variable by geography, medical specialty, or other factors
Describes situations that would be encountered in clinical practice
|
3 |
One or more regulated products NOT according to label and NOT according to standard of care
|
Study of renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension
Study involving apixiban for anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves
Study of intravenous or intramuscular lidocaine for pain relief in fibromyalgia
|
|
4 |
One or more regulated products for investigational use
|
Pivotal device studies
Phase II/III drug studies
|
|