Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jul 21;24(10):1564–1573. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0021

Table 4.

Distribution and adjusted odds ratios of asbestos exposure among women and men for the risk of lung cancer from a pooled dataset

Gender Exposed subjects (%) All Lung Cancer Lung Adenocarcinoma Lung Squamous




All Lung Cancer Case Lung Adenocarcinoma Lung Squamous Control







n (%) Asbestos
Exposure
Scorea
n (%) Asbestos
Exposure
Scorea
n (%) Asbestos
Exposure
Scorea
n (%) Asbestos
Exposure
Scorea
OR (95%CI) p-value OR (95%CI) p-value OR (95%CI) p-value















Women and Men 1120 (42.2) 0.64 (1.26) 414 (39.5) 0.60 (1.25) 369 (51.7) 0.80 (1.35) 816 (36.3) 0.47 (1.07) 1.10 (1.05–1.16)b 1.42E-04 1.07 (1.01–1.14)b 3.28E-02 1.19 (1.11–1.28)b 6.39E-07
Women 194 (24.0) 0.59 (1.43) 89 (24.5) 0.59 (1.11) 53 (27.2) 0.78 (1.22) 122 (20.6) 0.46 (0.97) 1.06 (0.97–1.15) c 1.98E-01 1.04 (0.94–1.16) c 4.05E-01 1.09 (0.97–1.23) c 1.44E-01
Men 926 (50.6) 0.67 (1.18) 325 (47.6) 0.61 (1.47) 316 (60.9) 0.83 (1.66) 694 (41.9) 0.51 (1.31) 1.16 (1.09–1.24)c 6.98E-06 1.15 (1.06–1.26)c 1.35E-03 1.24 (1.13–1.36)c 4.15E-06
a

Mean(SD) of log-transformed exposure score

b

Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated for one unit of increase in the log-transformed asbestos exposure score by mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, and center.

c

Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated for one unit of increase in the log-transformed asbestos exposure score by mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking status, and center.