Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 25;14(3):339–347. doi: 10.1002/wps.20252

Table 1.

Geographical differences in pooled metabolic syndrome (MetS) prevalence

Region No. studies Pooled MetS prevalence Cochran Q
Australia and New Zealand* 6 50.2% (95% CI: 35.3%-65.0%) 73.8, p<0.001
Middle-East 6 35.3% (95% CI: 31.3%-39.5%) 1287.6, p<0.001
North-America 46 32.4% (95% CI: 24.7%-40.8%) 38.0, p<0.001
Europe 81 32.0% (95% CI: 29.4%-34.7%) 1226.4, p<0.001
Asia 50 31.0% (95% CI: 27.7%-34.4%) 691.3, p<0.001
South-America 10 25.8% (95% CI: 20.7%-31.3%) 42.3, p<0.001
Country No. studies Pooled MetS prevalence Cochran Q
Australia 5 50.2% (95% CI: 32.9%-67.4%) 72.7, p<0.001
South Korea 7 38.9% (95% CI: 30.8%-47.3%) 103.3, p<0.001
The Netherlands 11 36.5% (95% CI: 29.0%-44.4%) 167.3, p<0.001
USA 38 36.4% (95% CI: 32.0%-40.9%) 1217.8, p<0.001
Croatia 7 33.1% (95% CI: 24.6%-42.3%) 39.1, p<0.001
Spain 12 31.0% (95% CI: 24.5%-37.9%) 210.3, p<0.001
Finland 5 30.4% (95% CI: 21.8%-39.8%) 17.9, p<0.001
Taiwan 13 29.8% (95% CI: 24.7%-35.1%) 124.1, p<0.001
Germany 6 28.7% (95% CI: 19.2%-39.2%) 62.8, p<0.001
Canada 5 27.4% (95% CI: 17.3%-38.7%) 44.2, p<0.001
India 16 26.3% (95% CI: 19.0%-34.3%) 193.0, p<0.001
Brazil 8 25.4% (95% CI: 18.5%-32.9%) 39.4, p<0.001
*

Significantly higher than in other regions, p<0.01