Table 3.
Tobit | Spatial Tobit | Spatial Tobit | |
---|---|---|---|
N = 5 | N = 10 | ||
Mean Income ($10,000)d | 0.078c | 0.084b | 0.069a |
(0.026) | (0.035) | (0.038) | |
Labour Force Participation Rate (%) | 0.027c | 0.034c | 0.034c |
(0.008) | (0.009) | (0.009) | |
Neighbouring Labour Force Participation Rate (%) | −0.037c | −0.037b | |
(0.014) | (0.017) | ||
Mortality Rate (%) | 0.034 | 0.014 | 0.010 |
(0.026) | (0.028) | (0.028) | |
Neighbouring Mortality Rate (%) | 0.015 | 0.011 | |
(0.053) | (0.068) | ||
ARIA scored | −0.085c | −0.061b | −0.067b |
(0.017) | (0.025) | (0.029) | |
Hospitals (count) | 0.380c | 0.377c | 0.385c |
(0.046) | (0.046) | (0.046) | |
Neighbouring Hospitals (count) | −0.015 | −0.116 | |
(0.106) | (0.144) | ||
Private Schools (count) | 0.094c | 0.075c | 0.072c |
(0.020) | (0.021) | (0.021) | |
Neighbouring Private Schools (count) | 0.091b | 0.146c | |
(0.039) | (0.047) | ||
Indigenous (%) | 0.023c | 0.012a | 0.011 |
(0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | |
Neighbouring Indigenous (%) | 0.012 | 0.026 | |
(0.013) | (0.016) | ||
Female (% of population) | 0.075c | 0.057c | 0.063c |
(0.017) | (0.019) | (0.018) | |
Neighbouring Female (% of population) | 0.047 | 0.020 | |
(0.032) | (0.039) | ||
Proportion over 65 (% of population) | 0.019a | 0.054c | 0.051c |
(0.011) | (0.013) | (0.013) | |
Neighbouring Proportion over 65 (% of population) | −0.086c | −0.082c | |
(0.020) | (0.023) | ||
Proportion under 14 (% of population) | −0.093c | −0.071c | −0.076c |
(0.009) | (0.013) | (0.013) | |
Neighbouring Proportion under 14 (% of population) | −0.031a | −0.031a | |
(0.017) | (0.018) | ||
Constant | −4.230c | −2.271 | −1.572 |
(1.039) | (1.880) | (2.387) | |
Log likelihood | −2872.085 | −2852.798 | −2852.942 |
Link-test hat-squared | −0.221c | −0.250c | −0.249c |
(0.033) | (0.032) | (0.032) | |
Moran’s I | 0.029c | 0.049c | |
z-score | 2.349 | 5.450 | |
Observations | 2032 | 2032 | 2032 |
Variable coefficients with standard errors in parentheses
asignificant at the 10% level; bsignificant at the 5% level; csignificant at the 1% level
dmeasured at the regional level for the spatial models (Eq. 3)