Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):51–56. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.051-056.oar

Table 1. Experimental group distribution according to each surface conditioning method.

Group Surface conditioning method
G1 37% gel phosphoric acid etching for one minute (FGM, SC, Brazil), followed by water rinsing for another minute and air drying procedure. Silane application for one minute (Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil).
G2 37% liquid phosphoric acid etching for one minute (Reliance, Itasca, IL, USA), removal of excess acid with gentle air drying, followed by silane application for another minute (Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil). Surface was thoroughly washed and dried (Swartz,18 2003).
G3 10% hydrofluoric acid etching for one minute (FGM, Joinville, SC, Brazil), followed by thorough washing and drying of surface.
G4 10% hydrofluoric acid etching for one minute (FGM, Joinville, SC, Brazil), followed by washing and drying of surface and application of silane for one minute (Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil).