Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 5;10(10):e0139355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139355

Table 2. (α = 0.05) Independent RV analysis.

Power in table based on 10000 replicates for each situation with a number of non-causal RVs.

OR = (2,2,2,2) OR = (4, 3, 1/3, 1/4)
No. of non-causal RVs 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12
Sum 0.710 0.482 0.362 0.289 0.501 0.315 0.237 0.191
SKAT 0.494 0.411 0.366 0.329 0.943 0.901 0.861 0.820
Seq-aSum 0.505 0.376 0.328 0.278 0.922 0.828 0.755 0.664
Seq-aSum-VS 0.500 0.397 0.337 0.285 0.906 0.836 0.768 0.681
LiMB (κ = 0.90)
Average no. branches 1.5 2.2 3.8 6.9 1.1 1.7 2.7 4.5
Average no. pared branches 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
wscore 0.481 0.388 0.325 0.275 0.908 0.823 0.737 0.645
pared wscore 0.475 0.391 0.324 0.272 0.906 0.827 0.736 0.638
BUR (κ = 0.95)
Average no. branches 1.4 3.4 16.4 97.0 1.5 4.2 18.5 121
Average no. pared branches 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 2.1
wscore 0.498 0.395 0.329 0.278 0.903 0.835 0.763 0.674
pared wscore 0.500 0.399 0.335 0.288 0.898 0.832 0.761 0.686
BUR (κ = 0.99)
Average no. branches 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.8 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.9
Average no. pared branches 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4
wscore 0.500 0.399 0.335 0.286 0.906 0.838 0.766 0.680
pared wscore 0.500 0.399 0.337 0.287 0.905 0.837 0.765 0.680