Table 1. The Hotelling’s T-squared test of VMR between different strains at 6 dpf.

A. The Hotelling’s T-squared test of VMR between different strains at 6 dpf
Comparison	Test statistic (p-value)
	Light-On (-29–0 s)	Light-On (1–30 s)	Light-Off (-29–0 s)	Light-Off (1–30 s)
AB VS. TL	1.4083 (0.1017)	5.1583 (< 0.0001)	1.1869 (0.2048)	2.9814 (< 0.0001)
TL VS. TLAB	1.1478 (0.2572)	3.5584 (< 0.0001)	2.3958 (< 0.0001)	2.7308 (< 0.0001)
AB VS. TLAB	3.2687 (< 0.0001)	2.7563 (< 0.0001)	1.9076 (0.0030)	4.6229 (< 0.0001)
B. The Hotelling’s T-squared test of Light-Off VMR between different strains at 6 dpf using data from two intervals: 1–2 s and 3–30 s
	Light-Off (1–2 s)		Light-Off (3–30 s)
AB VS. TL	30.6810 (<0.0001)		0.9048 (0.6014)
TL VS. TLAB	0.4844 (0.6116)		2.5142 (<0.0001)
AB VS. TLAB	21.668 (<0.0001)		4.1139 (<0.0001)
C. The Hotelling’s T-squared test of Light-On VMR between different strains at 6 dpf using data only from the first technical repeat
	Light-On (-29–0 s)		Light-On (1–30 s)
AB VS. TL	1.9571 (0.0018)		5.1843 (< 0.0001)
TL VS. TLAB	0.7555 (0.7778)		2.3645 (< 0.0001)
AB VS. TLAB	1.46 (0.0489)		3.7021 (< 0.0001)
D. The Hotelling’s T-squared test of Light-On VMR between different strains at 6 dpf using data from the second and third technical repeats
	Light-On (-29–0 s)	Light-On (1–30 s)	Light-Off (-29–0 s)	Light-Off (1–30 s)
AB VS. TL	0.7746 (0.7662)	2.547 (<0.0001)	1.6558 (0.0166)	1.8093 (0.0036)
TL VS. TLAB	1.9676 (0.0006)	2.3505 (<0.0001)	2.0502 (0.0006)	2.4196 (< 0.0001)
AB VS. TLAB	3.0192 (<0.0001)	1.4928 (0.0158)	1.6301 (0.0166)	3.9378 (< 0.0001)