Table 2.

Responses to a postsimulation–based mastery learning intervention course evaluation questionnaire (n=20)

Item	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Uncertain	Agree	Strongly Agree
Practice with the central line model boosts my skill to perform this procedure	0	0	0	3	17
Educational sessions using medical simulation are fun	0	0	0	2	17
It is OK to make clinical mistakes using the model	1	5	2	5	7
I receive useful educational feedback from the training sessions	0	0	0	1	19
Teamwork is improved by using the central line model	0	1	2	1	16
The central line model simulates central line procedures realistically	0	0	1	6	13
Practice with the central line model boosts my clinical self-confidence	0	0	0	6	14
Practice with the central line model has more educational value than patient care experience	4	2	5	3	6
The training staff is competent	0	0	0	1	19
Practice sessions during the training are a good use of my time	0	0	0	3	17
Practice sessions using procedural models should be a required component of nephrology fellowship	0	0	0	3	17
Repetitive practice using models is a valuable educational experience	0	0	0	6	14
Practice sessions using models are hard work	6	6	1	6	1
Increasing the difficulty of simulated clinical problems helps me become a better doctor	0	0	1	8	11
The controlled environment during the training helps me focus on clinical education problems	0	1	0	5	14
Clinical problems presented during the training are engaging	0	0	0	12	8
Practice with the central line model has helped prepare me to perform the procedure better than clinical experience alone	0	0	0	6	14