Recognize AKI requiring dialysis as a distinct clinical entity and different from ESRD |
Clinically and administratively distinguish patients with AKI requiring dialysis from patients with ESRD, with the implicit expectation for recovery of renal function |
Nephrologists must not feel pressured by hospital administrators or dialysis units to declare a patient as having ESRD |
Dialysis providers and patients need to be educated on signs of renal function recovery and approaches to limiting additional renal insults |
Develop specific protocols for patients with AKI requiring dialysis |
Clinical protocols that promote and monitor for renal function recovery should be used in patients with AKI |
Standard ESRD protocols should not be routinely implemented in patients with AKI |
Develop a separate reimbursement system for patients with AKI requiring dialysis |
Establish a distinct payment system for outpatient AKI dialysis care in ESRD facilities |
Establish reimbursement rates for AKI dialysis care that reflect a higher cost of care than for patients with ESRD because of increased monitoring needs (both physician assessments and laboratory testing) |
Formal recognition as a separately billed entity will encourage centers to develop AKI-specific protocols and procedures |
Coverage of outpatient dialysis by Medicare will permit characterization of this high–risk AKI population through significantly greater data capture |
Prioritize research to improve recovery of renal function |
Support research on therapeutics to promote recovery of renal function after AKI |
Support research to develop prediction tools or novel biomarkers for recovery of renal function after AKI requiring dialysis |
Support research aimed at establishing best practices for the promotion of recovery of renal function in patients with AKI requiring dialysis |