Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;39(10):1863–1877. doi: 10.1111/acer.12810

Table 1.

Effects of region specific lesions, administration of intracranial injections of pharmacological agents, and optogenetic- or DREADD-based activity manipulations on drug taking and seeking behaviors.

Brain Region(s) Cocaine Methamphetamine Alcohol Heroin Nicotine Reference(s)
dMPFC, PrL (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; Prelimbic cortex) TTX inactivation ↓seeking; optogenetic excitation ↓seeking and optogenetic inhibition ↓seeking B+M inactivation had no effect on context seeking but ↓ drug+cue seeking B+M inactivation ↓seeking B+M inactivation has no effect on seeking Bossert et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013; Fuchs et al., 2005; Li et al., 2015; Rocha and Kalivas, 2010; Stefanik et al., 2012; Willcocks and McNally, 2013
vPFC, IL (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Inrfalimbic cortex) TTX had no effect on seeking B+M inactivation↓ or had no effect on seeking B+M inactivation had no effect on seeking B+M inactivation and Daun02 inactivation ↓seeking Bossert et al., 2011; Fuchs et al., 2005; Li et al., 2015; Rocha and Kalivas, 2010; Willcocks and McNally, 2013
OFC (orbitofrontal cortex) LOFC B+M inactivation ↓seeking B+M inactivation had no effect on seeking Lasseter et al., 2009, Li et al., 2015
Ins (Insular cortex) B+M inactivation ↓SA and seeking Pushparaj et al., 2015
DStr (Dorsal striatum) DLS M+B inactivation or α-flupenthixol ↓ seeking; CNQX or JNJ16259685 had no effect on seeking DMS B+M inactivation prevents devalutation early in SA/habit learning; DLS B+M inactivation renew sensitivity to devaluation later in SA/habit learning SCH23390 ↓seeking; LY379268 had no effect on seeking Bossert et al., 2006, 2009; Corbit et al., 2012; Fuchs et al., 2006; Murray et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2012
NAc core (Nucleus accumbens, core subregion) optogenetic excitation of D2 MSNs ↓ SA; DREADD inhibition of D2 MSNs ↑SA; optogenetic inhibition, B+M inactivation, JNJ16259685 or CNQX, ↓seeking; DAUN02 inactivation had no effect on seeking B+M inactivation ↓seeking B+M inactivation or SCH23390 ↓seeking; high frequency DBS or lesion ↓intake LY379268 or SCH23390 had no effect on seeking Bock et al., 2013; Bossert et al., 2007; Cassataro et al., 2014; Chaudhri et al., 2009, 2010; Cruz et al., 2014; Fuchs et al., 2004, 2008; Rocha and Kalivas, 2010; Stefanik et al., 2012 Wilden et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2012
NAc shell (Nucleus accumbens, shell subregion) B+M inactivation ↓context-induced seeking; B+M inactivation has no effect on cue-induced seeking B+M inactivation, CART, CTAP or SCH23390 ↓seeking; ↓seeking LY379268 or SCH23390 ↓seeking Bossert et al., 2006, 2007; Chaudhri et al., 2009; Fuchs et al., 2004; Fuchs et al., 2008; Millan and McNally, 2012; Perry and McNally, 2013
VP (Ventral pallidum) lesion ↓seeking lesion ↓seeking Hubner and Koob, 1990
BLA (Basolateral amygdala) TTX inactivation ↓seeking B+M inactivation had no effect on seeking naloxone methiodide ↓seeking SB-277011-A ↓seeking; B+M inactivation had no effect on SA Fuchs et al., 2005; Li et al., 2015; Khaled et al., 2014; Marinelli et al., 2010; Yu and Sharp, 2015
CeA (Central nucleus of the amygdala) SCH23390 ↓SA; LY37928 ↓seeking B+M inactivation ↓seeking UCN3 and D-Phe-CRF(12-41) ↓SA Caine et al., 1995; Funk et al., 2006, 2007; Li et al., 2015; Lu et al.., 2007
BNST (Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis) B+M inactivation ↓seeking LeuPro NPY ↓binge drinking; DREADD-mediated inhibition of CRF + neurons ↓binge drinking Buffalari and See, 2011; Pleil et al., 2015
HIP (Hippocampus) TTX, AP5, PP2, Ro25-6981, JNJ16259685, and CNQX in dHip ↓seeking; M+B in CA3 or VHip ↓seeking; M+B in pDHip had no effect on seeking blockade of opioid receptors in dHip had no effect on seeking B+M inactivation of vSub ↓seeking Bossert and Stern, 2014; Fuchs et al., 2005; Lasseter et al., 2010; Luo et al., 2011; Marinelli et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2010, 2013, 2014
Hab (Habenula) Lhab high+low combination DBS ↓seeking; Lhab lesion ↑seeking Lhab lesions ↑SA Hab lesion has no effect on SA Lidocaine-induced inactivation mHab ↑SA; SB-277011-A ↓seeking Fowler et al., 2011; Friedman et al., 2010; Haack et al., 2014; Khaled et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2009
VTA (Ventral tegmental area) optogenetic excitation (tonic firing) ↓intake Bass et al., 2013
LH (Lateral hypothalamus) B+M inactivation ↓seeking Marchant et al., 2014
EW (Edinger-westphal nucleus) lesion ↓drinking Bachtell et al., 2004
BLA - NAc asymmetrical disconnection (M+B in BLA; NBQX in NAc shell) ↑seeking Millan and McNally, 2011;
VTA - NAc Core optogenetic inhibition ↓seeking Stefanik et al., 2013
mPFC - NAc Core optogenetic inhibition ↓SA paired with aversive stimulus Seif et al., 2013
Ins - NAc Core optogenetic inhibition ↓SA paired with aversive stimulus Seif et al., 2013
PrL - NAc Core optogenetic inhibition ↓seeking Stefanik et al., 2012
IL - NAc Shell pharmacological inactivation or optogenetic induction of LTD ↑seeking asymmetrical disconnection ↓seeking Bossert et al., 2012; LaLumiere et al., 2012; Peters et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2014

Black box = manipulation changes drug self-administration or seeking behaviors (where arrow denotes increase or decrease in behavior, and underline denotes additional study showing no effect); Gray box = manipulation has no effect on drug self-administration or seeking; White box = area untested in a similar manner. Abbreviations: B+M, baclofen + muscimol; DREADD, designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drug; MSN, medium spiny neuron; SA, self-administration; TTX, tetrodotoxin.