Table 3.
μStop
| Participant | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D (ms) | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
| 40 | 22 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 25 |
| 70 | 22 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 22 | 23 | 22 |
| 100 | 18 | 16 | 19 | 19 | 29 | 18 | 20 |
| 130 | 21 | 15 | 24 | 21 | 63 | 26 | 22 |
| 160 | 22 | 15 | 45 | 18 | 90 | 26 | 110 |
The best‐fit values for μStop are shown (Hz) for all participants and each value of D, using a model in which ΔT, the difference between the afferent delays for Go and Stop, is taken to be −10 ms. Other parameters (τ and L, time‐constant and degree of lateral inhibition, and σstop) were invariant across subjects (τ = 67 ms, L = 2%, σstop = 5.0 Hz).