TABLE 1:
Practitioners’ selection of different diagnostic tests in horses with colic, and the reasons they would not use specific tests, from a mixed methods survey of UK practitioners
Diagnostic test | Estimated % of colic cases in which test is used (mean+/SD (range: min–max)) | Scenario in which test is considered to be most useful (most common category identified) | Primary reason for not performing diagnostic test (% frequency of responses) | Top 3 reasons for not performing diagnostic test (% of summed responses) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response to analgesia/treatment | 87.2±24.0 (range 0–100) |
All/most scenarios | Test not required to contribute to diagnosis/treatment (49.5%, 50/161) |
|
Rectal examination | 75.92±21.2 (range 0–100) |
Identification of specific lesion or case type (including differentiating medical v surgical) | Test not required to contribute to diagnosis/treatment (32.9%, 56/270) |
|
Nasogastric intubation | 43.85±27.6 (range 0–100) |
Diagnosis of cases with suspected proximal lesion (oesophageal/gastric or small intestinal) | Test not required to contribute to diagnosis/treatment (69.9%, 121/173) |
|
Haematology and biochemistry | 15.23±20.6 (range 0–100) |
Diagnosis of recurrent colic/ongoing cases | Test not required to contribute to diagnosis/treatment (63.6%, 110/173) |
|
Abdominocentesis | 13.45±17.8 (range 0–100) |
Determination of diagnosis/prognosis of medical v surgical/severe cases of colic/decision for euthanasia | Test not required to contribute to diagnosis/treatment (65.9%, 116/176) |
|
Ultrasound | 8.04±18.1 (range: 0–100) |
Identification of specific lesion or case type (including differentiating medical v surgical) | Test not required to contribute to diagnosis/treatment (44.0%, 74/168) |
|