Table 4.
Predictors of having quit for at least 1 month since last being surveyed, among those with quit attempts
SEIFA Univariate |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | OR | 95% CI | N | OR | 95% CI | N | OR | 95% CI | |
Total N | 1359 | 1310 | 1240 | ||||||
Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD) | |||||||||
Lowest disadvantage | 198 | Ref | (p < .001) | 192 | Ref | (p < .001) | 183 | Ref | (p < .01) |
Low disadvantage | 262 | 0.5** | 0.4 – 0.8 | 258 | 0.6** | 0.4 – 0.8 | 246 | 0.6* | 0.4 – 0.9 |
Moderate disadvantage | 271 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.2 | 257 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.4 | 241 | 1.0 | 0.7 – 1.6 |
High disadvantage | 300 | 0.5*** | 0.3 – 0.7 | 292 | 0.5** | 0.3 – 0.7 | 275 | 0.5** | 0.4 – 0.8 |
Highest disadvantage | 328 | 0.7* | 0.5 – 0.9 | 311 | 0.7 | 0.5 – 1.1 | 295 | 0.8 | 0.5 – 1.2 |
Main language spoken at home | |||||||||
English | 1163 | Ref | (p = .763) | 1107 | Ref | (p = .836) | |||
Not English | 147 | 0.9 | 0.7 – 1.4 | 133 | 1.0 | 0.7 – 1.6 | |||
Equivalized household incomea | |||||||||
Low | 272 | Ref | (p = .051) | 257 | Ref | (p = .253) | |||
Low-moderate | 211 | 1.3 | 0.9 – 1.8 | 193 | 1.2 | 0.8 – 1.8 | |||
Moderate | 234 | 1.4 | 0.96 – 2.0 | 223 | 1.4 | 0.9 – 2.1 | |||
High-moderate | 250 | 1.3 | 0.9 – 1.9 | 238 | 1.1 | 0.7 – 1.6 | |||
High | 265 | 1.9** | 1.3 – 2.7 | 258 | 1.5* | 1.02 – 2.3 | |||
Not disclosed | 78 | 1.2 | 0.7 – 2.0 | 71 | 1.0 | 0.6 – 1.9 | |||
Education | |||||||||
Low | 813 | Ref | (p = .286) | 763 | Ref | (p = .722) | |||
Moderate | 295 | 1.2 | 0.9 – 1.6 | 282 | 1.0 | 0.8 – 1.4 | |||
High | 202 | 1.2 | 0.8 – 1.7 | 195 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.3 | |||
Marital Status | |||||||||
Married | 465 | Ref | (p = .407) | 445 | Ref | (p = .389) | |||
Separated/ divorced/ widowed | 282 | 0.8 | 0.6 – 1.2 | 266 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.2 | |||
DeFacto | 205 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.3 | 196 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.3 | |||
Single | 358 | 0.8 | 0.6 – 1.1 | 333 | 0.7 | 0.5 – 1.05 | |||
Age group (years) | |||||||||
18 – 24 | 200 | Ref | (p < .05) | 191 | Ref | (p < .05) | |||
25 – 39 | 468 | 0.7* | 0.5 – 0.95 | 448 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.003 | |||
40 – 54 | 419 | 0.6** | 0.4 – 0.8 | 400 | 0.5** | 0.3 – 0.8 | |||
55 and older | 223 | 0.6* | 0.4 – 0.9 | 201 | 0.6* | 0.3 – 0.96 | |||
Sex | |||||||||
Female | 731 | Ref | (p = .555) | 688 | Ref | (p = .204) | |||
Male | 579 | 1.1 | 0.8 – 1.4 | 552 | 1.2 | 0.9 – 1.5 | |||
Heaviness of Smoking Index | |||||||||
0 | 228 | Ref | (p = .105) | ||||||
1 to 2 | 374 | 0.7 | 0.5 – 1.02 | ||||||
3 to 4 | 492 | 0.6* | 0.4 – 0.9 | ||||||
5 to 6b | 146 | 0.6* | 0.3 – 0.99 | ||||||
Longest prior quit attempt | |||||||||
None | 119 | Ref | (p < .001) | ||||||
Under 1 month | 311 | 0.4** | 0.2 – 0.7 | ||||||
1 month – under 6 months | 300 | 1.1 | 0.6 – 1.7 | ||||||
6 months or longer | 510 | 1.2 | 0.7 – 1.9 | ||||||
Quit attempts in the last year? | |||||||||
Yes | 741 | Ref | (p = .316) | ||||||
No | 499 | 0.9 | 0.6 – 1.2 | ||||||
Baseline smoking frequency | |||||||||
Daily | 1080 | Ref | (p < .01) | ||||||
Weekly or monthly | 160 | 1.8** | 1.2 – 2.7 | ||||||
Intention to quit | |||||||||
None | 127 | Ref | (p = .658) | ||||||
Beyond 6 months | 405 | 1.1 | 0.7 – 1.7 | ||||||
Within 6 months | 420 | 1.2 | 0.8 – 2.0 | ||||||
Within 1 month | 288 | 1.0 | 0.6 – 1.7 | ||||||
Overall opinion of smoking | |||||||||
Positive or neutral | 428 | Ref | (p = .683) | ||||||
Negative | 515 | 1.0 | 0.8 – 1.4 | ||||||
Very negative | 297 | 1.2 | 0.8 – 1.7 | ||||||
Self-efficacy to quit | 1240 | 1.1* | 1.02 – 1.3 | ||||||
Expected benefits of quitting | 1240 | 0.8** | 0.7 – 0.9 | ||||||
Worries about health effects | 1240 | 1.0 | 0.9 – 1.2 | ||||||
Favourable attitudes to smoking | 1240 | 1.1 | 0.9 – 1.2 | ||||||
Time (months) since baseline | 1240 | 1.13*** | 1.09 – 1.18 | ||||||
Likelihood ratio: | χ2(2) = 93.7, p < .001 | χ2(2) = 234.5, p < .001 |
Note: Overall significance levels for each categorical variable are provided in brackets next to the reference category.
In the postal-area (POA)-level analyses controlling for clustering, the overall effects of this variable were significant (p < .05) in the Model 2 analysis
In the POA-level analyses controlling for clustering, this category did not reach statistical significance relative to the reference in the Model 3 analysis.
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001.