Table 5.
Predictors of having quit for at least 6 months since last being surveyed, among those with quit attempts.
SEIFA Univariate |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | OR | 95% CI | N | OR | 95% CI | N | OR | 95% CI | |
Total N | 1332 | 1283 | 1217 | ||||||
Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD) | |||||||||
Lowest disadvantage | 195 | Ref | (p = .057) | 189 | Ref | (p = .243) | 181 | Ref | (p = .387) |
Low disadvantage | 259 | 0.6 | 0.3 – 1.1 | 255 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.3 | 243 | 0.7 | 0.3 – 1.3 |
Moderate disadvantage | 268 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.3 | 254 | 0.9 | 0.5 – 1.6 | 239 | 0.9 | 0.5 – 1.8 |
High disadvantage | 292 | 0.4** | 0.2 – 0.8 | 284 | 0.5 | 0.3 – 1.02 | 268 | 0.6 | 0.3 – 1.2 |
Highest disadvantage | 318 | 0.8 | 0.4 – 1.3 | 301 | 0.9 | 0.5 – 1.8 | 286 | 1.1 | 0.6 – 2.1 |
Main language spoken at home | |||||||||
English | 1142 | Ref | (p = .875) | 1089 | Ref | (p = .500) | |||
Not English | 141 | 1.0 | 0.6 – 1.9 | 128 | 1.2 | 0.7 – 2.4 | |||
Equivalized household income | |||||||||
Low | 267 | Ref | (p = .061) | 254 | Ref | (p = .160) | |||
Low-moderatea | 204 | 2.1 | 1.0 – 4.1 | 187 | 1.9 | 0.9 – 4.0 | |||
Moderate | 227 | 1.0 | 0.5 – 2.2 | 216 | 0.8 | 0.4 – 1.9 | |||
High-moderate | 249 | 1.8 | 0.9 – 3.5 | 238 | 1.4 | 0.7 – 2.8 | |||
High | 258 | 2.0* | 1.01 – 3.9 | 251 | 1.5 | 0.7 – 3.2 | |||
Not disclosed | 78 | 2.7* | 1.2 – 6.2 | 71 | 2.3 | 0.9 – 5.7 | |||
Education | |||||||||
Low | 792 | Ref | (p = .072) | 745 | Ref | (p = .566) | |||
Moderate | 290 | 1.5 | 0.9 – 2.3 | 278 | 1.3 | 0.8 – 2.1 | |||
High | 201 | 1.7* | 1.03 – 2.9 | 194 | 1.3 | 0.7 – 2.3 | |||
Marital Status | |||||||||
Married | 458 | Ref | (p = .115) | 438 | Ref | (p = .120) | |||
Separated/ divorced/ widowed | 276 | 0.6 | 0.3 – 1.04 | 262 | 0.6 | 0.3 – 1.1 | |||
DeFacto | 200 | 1.1 | 0.6 – 1.9 | 192 | 1.2 | 0.7 – 2.1 | |||
Single | 349 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.1 | 325 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.3 | |||
Age group (years) | |||||||||
18 – 24 | 194 | Ref | (p = .204) | 186 | Ref | (p = .148) | |||
25 – 39 | 461 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.3 | 442 | 0.8 | 0.4 – 1.5 | |||
40 – 54b | 411 | 0.5* | 0.3 – 0.97 | 393 | 0.5* | 0.2 – 0.98 | |||
55 and older | 217 | 0.6 | 0.3 – 1.3 | 196 | 0.6 | 0.3 – 1.6 | |||
Sex | |||||||||
Female | 720 | Ref | (p = .836) | 679 | Ref | (p = .526) | |||
Male | 563 | 1.0 | 0.7 – 1.4 | 538 | 1.1 | 0.7 – 1.8 | |||
Heaviness of Smoking Index | |||||||||
0 | 226 | Ref | (p = .194) | ||||||
1 to 2 | 369 | 0.7 | 0.4 – 1.2 | ||||||
3 to 4 | 479 | 0.5* | 0.3 – 0.9 | ||||||
5 to 6 | 143 | 0.5 | 0.2 – 1.3 | ||||||
Longest prior quit attempt | |||||||||
None | 117 | Ref | (p < .05) | ||||||
Under 1 month | 304 | 0.8 | 0.3 – 2.1 | ||||||
1 month – under 6 months | 290 | 1.5 | 0.6 – 3.7 | ||||||
6 months or longer | 506 | 1.9 | 0.9 – 4.3 | ||||||
Quit attempts in the last year? | |||||||||
Yes | 726 | Ref | (p = .998) | ||||||
No | 491 | 1.0 | 0.6 – 1.6 | ||||||
Baseline smoking frequency | |||||||||
Daily | 1062 | Ref | (p = .541) | ||||||
Weekly or monthly | 155 | 1.2 | 0.7 – 2.2 | ||||||
Intention to quit | |||||||||
None | 126 | Ref | (p = .876) | ||||||
Beyond 6 months | 398 | 0.8 | 0.4 – 1.7 | ||||||
Within 6 months | 412 | 0.8 | 0.4 – 1.7 | ||||||
Within 1 month | 281 | 0.7 | 0.3 – 1.6 | ||||||
Overall opinion of smoking | |||||||||
Positive or neutral | 422 | Ref | (p = .080) | ||||||
Negative | 501 | 1.8* | 1.1 – 3.0 | ||||||
Very negative | 294 | 1.8 | 0.9 – 3.3 | ||||||
Self-efficacy to quit | 1217 | 1.2 | 0.999 – 1.4 | ||||||
Expected benefits of quitting | 1217 | 0.9 | 0.8 – 1.2 | ||||||
Worries about health effects | 1217 | 1.0 | 0.7 – 1.3 | ||||||
Favourable attitudes to smoking | 1217 | 1.0 | 0.8 – 1.3 | ||||||
Time (months) since baseline | 1.2*** | 1.1 – 1.3 | |||||||
Likeihood ratio: | χ2(2) = 83.0, p < .001 | χ2(2) = 114.2, p < .001 |
Note: Overall significance levels for each categorical variable are provided in brackets next to the reference category.
In the postal-area (POA)-level analyses controlling for clustering, this category was significantly different from the reference (p < .05) in the Model 2 analysis.
In the POA-level analyses controlling for clustering, this category was no longer significantly different from the reference category in the Model 3 analysis.
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001.