Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 25;109(5):668–675. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.47

Table 3.

Association between population density and case definitions of increasing specificity for eosinophilic esophagitis

Esophageal eosinophiliaa with dysphagia (n=7,128)e
Esophageal eosinophilia and exclusion of competing conditionsb (n=3,905)e
Esophageal eosinophilia, exclusions of competing conditions, and eosinophilic microabscesses (n=1,337)e
Population densityc OR (95% CI) aORd (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aORd (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aORd (95% CI)
0-251 1.63 (1.50, 1.76) 1.59 (1.45, 1.76) 1.48 (1.33, 1.65) 1.41 (1.24, 1.60) 1.53 (1.27, 1.83) 1.41 (1.14, 1.76)
252-820 1.57 (1.45, 1.70) 1.48 (1.35, 1.61) 1.48 (1.33, 1.64) 1.37 (1.21, 1.54) 1.65 (1.38, 1.97) 1.54 (1.26, 1.88)
821-1,937 1.35 (1.25, 1.47) 1.26 (1.16, 1.37) 1.28 (1.15, 1.42) 1.17 (1.05, 1.31) 1.45 (1.22, 1.75) 1.34 (1.11, 1.62)
1,938-3,744 1.34 (1.23, 1.45) 1.26 (1.15, 1.37) 1.31 (1.18, 1.46) 1.21 (1.09, 1.35) 1.37 (1.14, 1.64) 1.25 (1.04, 1.51)
3,745-144,333 Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent
p for trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.016 <0.001
a

≥15 eos/hpf

b

Competing conditions for esophageal eosinophilia included reflux/heartburn symptoms, reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus on biopsy, inflammatory bowel disease, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis

c

Persons per square mile

d

Adjusted for age, sex, distance patient traveled to endoscopy site, and the proportion in the population in each zip code that reported White race

e

Number of patients meeting case group definition