Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 25;109(5):668–675. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.47

Table 4.

Association between population density and increasing levels of esophageal eosinophilia

≥ 15 eos/hpf (n=14,381)c
≥ 50 eos/hpf (n=3,783)c
≥ 100 eos/hpf (n=823)c
Population densitya OR (95% CI) aORb (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aORb (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aORb (95% CI)
1-251 1.28 (1.21, 1.36) 1.27 (1.18, 1.36) 1.38 (1.24, 1.54) 1.45 (1.27, 1.65) 1.36 (1.08, 1.72) 1.51 (1.14, 1.99)
252-820 1.27 (1.20, 1.34) 1.22 (1.15, 1.30) 1.36 (1.22, 1.51) 1.41 (1.25, 1.58) 1.39 (1.11, 1.75) 1.57 (1.22, 2.03)
821-1,937 1.20 (1.13, 1.27) 1.15 (1.08, 1.22) 1.34 (1.20, 1.48) 1.33 (1.19, 1.49) 1.52 (1.23, 1.89) 1.60 (1.26, 2.02)
1,938-3,744 1.20 (1.13, 1.27) 1.15 (1.08, 1.22) 1.28 (1.15, 1.42) 1.23 (1.10, 1.38) 1.41 (1.12, 1.76) 1.39 (1.10, 1.75)
3,745-144,333 Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent
p for trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.016 0.003
a

Persons per square mile

b

Adjusted for age, sex, distance patient traveled to endoscopy site, and the proportion in the population in each zip code that reported white race

c

Number of patients meeting case group definition