Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Roles. 2015 Jun 6;73(1):43–57. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0483-z

Table 4.

Models testing the mediating effects of experienced bi-negativity, using Preacher & Hayes methods.

95% Confidence Interval (CI)1
κ 2 2 Mediation Effect Lower Upper %Mediated3
Single Female versus Single Male Partner4
        Alcohol-related consequences 0.04 0.18 0.06 0.38 29%
        Binge drinking 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.35 19%
Single Female/Male Partner versus Multiple Female/Male Partners5
        Depressive symptoms 0.04 1.13 0.50 2.05 39%
        Alcohol-related consequences 0.04 0.16 0.07 0.29 30%

Note. CI = confidence interval. Boldface type highlights a significant effect as determined by the 95% bias corrected and accelerated confidence interval (95% CI).

1

5,000 resamples.

2

Kappa-squared is a standardized “proportion of the maximum possible indirect effect”(Preacher & Kelley 2011).

3

%Mediated was calculated as ab/(ab+c').

4

N=305-310.

5

N=424-429.