Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 15;192(6):682–694. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201412-2278OC

Table 3.

Inflammatory Mediators in Sinonasal Tissue Extracts

  Control UT (Mean ± SEM) CRSsNP UT (Mean ± SEM) CRSwNP UT (Mean ± SEM) CRSwNP Polyp (Mean ± SEM)
ECP* 113,000 ± 64,900 49,600 ± 13,700 258,000 ± 89,500 763,000 ± 210,000
IL-4* 8.4 ± 3.2 0.7 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 1.0 4.1 ± 1.1
IL-5* 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.4 0.6 ± 0.2 11.3  ± 4.4§
IL-10* 0.4 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.5 0.5 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.2§
IL-13* 0.7 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 1.2 14.7 ± 4.7
Eotaxin-2* 150 ± 74.7 259 ± 80.1 319 ± 92.4 1,460 ± 475
Eotaxin-3* 1.5 ± 0.8 194 ± 136 378 ± 93.5 400 ± 138
RANTES* 3,432 ± 703 2,233 ± 856 1,982 ± 307 983 ± 353
Eotaxin-1 20.0 ± 6.9 32.7 ± 10.3 17.3 ± 3.4 75.5 ± 18.3§
MCP-4 11.5 ± 4.1 11.2 ± 4.4 15.7 ± 4.5 109 ± 53.9
TARC 2.6 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 1.1 4.6 ± 1.4 9.9 ± 3.5
SCF 43.3 ± 11.8 29.7 ± 9.9 32.1 ± 5.3 14.5 ± 4.6
GM-CSF 0.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.5
MCP-1 352 ± 81.0 338 ± 135 279 ± 52.1 531 ± 92.4
IL-6 2.3 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 3.4 1.8 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 1.7
IL-33 195 ± 67.2 149 ± 24.7 154 ± 22.4 136 ± 49.7
IFN-α2 15.2 ± 7.4 3.8 ± 0.5 6.2 ± 1.5 2.9 ± 0.7
IFN-γ 0.9 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.10 0.9 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1
BCA-1 42.4 ± 24.8 85.7 ± 40.6 136 ± 109 221 ± 110
SDF-1α and SDF-1β 101 ± 40.6 61.8 ± 28.1 52.2 ± 11.2 29.7 ± 13.0

Definition of abbreviations: BCA = B cell–attracting chemokine; CRSsNP = chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps; CRSwNP = chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps; ECP = eosinophil cationic protein; MCP = monocyte chemoattractant protein; GM-CSF = granulocyte–macrophage colony–stimulating factor; RANTES = regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted protein; SCF = stem cell factor; SDF = stromal cell–derived factor; TARC = thymus and activation–regulated chemokine; UT = uncinate tissue.

All values are given in picograms per milligram of total protein. Bold indicates mediators of particular interest.

*

P < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis test for statistical significance.

Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared with control UT accordng to post hoc analysis using Dunn’s multiple-comparisons test.

Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared with CRSsNP UT accordng to post hoc analysis using Dunn’s multiple-comparisons test.

§

Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared with CRSwNP UT accordng to post hoc analysis using Dunn’s multiple-comparisons test.

P < 0.01, Kruskal–Wallis test for statistical significance.

P < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test for statistical significance.