Skip to main content
. 2015 May 13;2:15019. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2015.19

Table 2. Comparison between ZFNs, TALENs, and CRRISR/Cas systems for genome editing.

  ZFNs TALENs CRISPR/Cas
Target DNA recognition Protein–DNA Protein–DNA RNA–DNA
Key components ZF-Fok I fusion protein TALE-Fok I fusion protein Guide RNA and Cas9 protein
Function mode ZF proteins recognize target DNA sequences → dimerization of Fok I nucleases induces DSBs of DNA → DSBs are repaired by NHEJ or HDR TALE proteins recognize target DNA sequences → dimerization of Fok I nucleases induces DSBs of DNA → BSDs are repaired by NHEJ or HDR Guide RNA recognizes target DNA sequence next to a NGG motif → Cas9 induces DSBs of DNA → DSBs are repaired by NHEJ or HDR
Advantages Highly efficient and specific Highly efficient and specific Highly efficient, easy to be constructed, and capable of editing multiple sites simultaneously
Disadvantages Large-scale screening, time-consuming and expensive to be constructed Tedious and time-consuming to be constructed PAM motif next to target sequence required

DSB, double strand break; NHEJ, non-homologous end joining; HDR, homology-directed repair.