Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 21;2(4):ENEURO.0071-15.2015. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0071-15.2015

Table 5.

Multiple-comparisons following one-way ANOVA and nonparametric test

24 h LP DP
Data n1 n2 Mean (rank) differences Adjusted p value Mean rank differences Adjusted p value Mean rank differences Adjusted p value
Holm–Sidak's test Dunn's test Dunn's test
Fig. 8B Female vs male 100% 6 6 −92.42 0.3864 −6.833 >0.9999 6 >0.9999
Female vs male 50% 6 7 388.2 <0.0001 11.31 0.3021 17.79 0.0065
Female vs male 77% 6 7 427.3 <0.0001 12.6 0.1579 19.5 0.0019
Female vs male 33% 6 6 435.2 <0.0001 11.83 0.2887 19.83 0.0025
Male 100% vs male 50% 6 7 480.6 <0.0001 18.14 0.0051 11.79 0.2393
Male 100% vs male 77% 6 7 519.7 <0.0001 19.43 0.002 13.5 0.0969
Male100% vs male 33% 6 6 527.6 <0.0001 18.67 0.0057 13.83 0.1064
Male 50% vs male 77% 7 7 39.07 0.7816 1.286 >0.9999 1.714 >0.9999
Male 50% vs male 33% 7 6 46.98 0.7816 0.5238 >0.9999 2.048 >0.9999
Male 77% vs male 33% 7 6 7.905 0.8861 −0.7619 >0.9999 0.3333 >0.9999
Dunn's test Dunn's test Dunn's test
Fig. 8D Female vs 100% male 8 8 −24 0.1486 −44.5 <0.0001 23 0.2018
Female vs 4% male 8 12 5.667 >0.9999 -5.5 >0.9999 8.167 >0.9999
Female vs 10% male 8 12 22 0.1441 1.167 >0.9999 39.17 <0.0001
Female vs 90% male 8 12 3.333 >0.9999 −22.17 0.1361 33.5 0.0012
Female vs 96% male 8 12 -9.667 >0.9999 -31.83 0.0027 23.83 0.0754
100% male vs 4% male 8 12 29.67 0.0072 39 <0.0001 −14.83 >0.9999
100% male vs 10% male 8 12 46 <0.0001 45.67 <0.0001 16.17 0.8556
100% male vs 90% male 8 12 27.33 0.0194 22.33 0.1285 10.5 >0.9999
100% male vs 96% male 8 12 14.33 >0.9999 12.67 >0.9999 0.8333 >0.9999
4% male vs 10% male 12 12 16.33 0.4738 6.667 >0.9999 31 0.0007
4% male vs 90% male 12 12 −2.333 >0.9999 −16.67 0.4241 25.33 0.0128
4% male vs 96% male 12 12 −15.33 0.6539 −26.33 0.0079 15.67 0.5883
10% male vs 90% male 12 12 −18.67 0.2104 −23.33 0.032 -5.667 >0.9999
10% male vs 96% male 12 12 −31.67 0.0005 −33 0.0002 −15.33 0.6539
90% male vs 96% male 12 12 −13 >0.9999 −9.667 >0.9999 −9.667 >0.9999