Table 3.
LJ result |
MGIT result |
Xpert result |
Direct Xpert n |
Concentrated Xpert n |
---|---|---|---|---|
R | R | R | 43 | 43 |
R | S | R | 1 | 1 |
S | R | R | 1 | 1 |
S | S | R | 1 | 1 |
R | R | S | 1 | 1 |
R | S | S | 4 | 4 |
S | S | S | 28 | 27 |
N/A | R | R | 11 | 11 |
N/A | S | S | 10 | 9 |
R | N/A | R | 1 | 1 |
N/A | N/A | S | 7 a | 6 b |
N/A | N/A | R | 7 c | 4 d |
N/A | S | N/A | 1 | 2 |
S | S | N/A | 0 | 1 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | 3 | 7 |
Note. R=resistant; S=susceptible; N/A=result not available (contamination on LJ or MGIT or “invalid”, “error” result on Xpert).
2 of 7 specimens were from cases with TB ruled out;
3 of 6 specimens were from cases with TB ruled out;
1 of 7 specimens from case with TB ruled out;
1 specimen from case with TB ruled out.