Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0139960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139960

Fig 2. RYGB reduces energy intake feeding efficiency in ob/ob mice.

Fig 2

(A) Daily energy intake (in kJ) in sham, PF-sham and RYGB-treated ob/ob mice. (B) Feeding efficiency (weight change per kJ of diet consumed) in sham, PF-sham and RYGB-treated ob/ob mice. (C) Total 24-hr energy expenditure (in kJ/day) in PF-sham and RYGB. (n = 24–25, sham; n = 7, PF-sham; n = 17, RYGB). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. * P < .05 vs sham, # P < .05 vs PF-sham were assessed using 1-Way ANOVA or Student’s t-test, where appropriate.