Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;93(4):761–766. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0225

Table 2.

Proportion of patients with brucellosis showing suppurative hepatosplenic abscesses due to Brucella spp.

N Liver abscess % (95% CI) Spleen abscess % (95% CI) All % (95% CI)
Retrospective*
 Reference15 905 14 1.5 (0.8–2.5) 2 0.2 (0.02–0.7) 16 1.7 (1.0–2.8)
 Reference2 530 1 0.2 (0.01–1.0) 0 0 (0–0.7) 1 0.2 (0.01–1.0)
 Sub-Total 1,435 15 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 2 0.1 (0.01–0.5) 17 1.2 (0.7–1.8)
Prospective clinical
 Reference17 709 4 0.6 (0.14–1.5) 3 0.4 (0.09–1.2) 7 1.0 (0.4–2.0)
Prospective screening
 Reference21 80 2 2.5 (0.3–8.7) 1 1.3 (0.03–6.7) 3 3.8 (0.8–10.6)
 Reference22 251 0 0 (0–1.4) 4 1.6 (0.4–4.0) 4 1.6 (0.4–4.0)
  Sub-Total 331 2 0.6 (0.1–2.1) 5 1.5 (0.5–3.5) 7 2.1 (0.9–4.3)
  Total 2,475 21 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 10 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 31 1.2 (0.8–1.8)

CI = confidence interval.

*

Review of patient's files after discharge.

Patients prospectively screened clinically for signs and symptoms of liver/spleen abscess at the time of diagnosis of brucellosis then imaged.

Patients prospectively screened by ultrasound at the time of diagnosis of brucellosis.