Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 May 20;21(4):285–296. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000223

Table 2.

Associations between Contextual Cueing and MTL Subregions

Variablesa Estimate (SE)b p value
CA1 0.70 (0.21) 0.0021
CA2 0.009 (0.07) 0.184
CA3 −0.01 (0.03) 0.637
DG 0.33 (0.14) 0.023
SUB 0.17 (0.06) 0.014
ERC 0.002 (0.005) 0.720
BA35 0.002 (0.005) 0.697
BA36 −0.008 (0.018) 0.653

CA = cornu ammonis; DG = dentate gyrus; SUB = subiculum; ERC = entorhinal cortex; BA = Brodmann area. All the variables represent regions on the right hemisphere.

a

Linear regression models adjusted for intracranial volume (ICV).

b

The estimates are unstandardized beta weights.