Table 4.
β regression coefficients for the relationships between log-transformed biomarkers and dietary indices and dietary pattern scores
| Dietary pattern or index |
Log-Leptin, ng/mL |
Log-sICAM-1, ng/mL |
Log-CRP, mg/L |
Log-Irisin, ng/mL |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized β | P | Standardized β | P | Standardized β | P | Standardized β | P | |
| AHEI-2010 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | −0.22 | 0.005 | −0.15 | 0.078 | −0.31 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.890 |
| Model 2 | −0.13 | 0.132 | −0.12 | 0.266 | −0.21 | 0.018 | 0.12 | 0.224 |
| Model 3 | −0.08 | 0.416 | −0.11 | 0.294 | −0.16 | 0.103 | 0.21 | 0.056 |
| DASH | ||||||||
| Model 1 | −0.16 | 0.055 | −0.10 | 0.247 | −0.31 | 0.001 | 0.14 | 0.113 |
| Model 2 | −0.04 | 0.610 | −0.07 | 0.509 | −0.20 | 0.023 | 0.21 | 0.025 |
| Model 3 | −0.07 | 0.434 | −0.07 | 0.534 | −0.16 | 0.095 | 0.23 | 0.030 |
| Western diet (factor 1) | ||||||||
| Model 1 | 0.06 | 0.437 | 0.03 | 0.760 | 0.03 | 0.734 | −0.08 | 0.367 |
| Model 2 | 0.42 | 0.006 | 0.44 | 0.024 | 0.41 | 0.021 | −0.05 | 0.781 |
| Model 3 | 0.50 | 0.008 | 0.52 | 0.013 | 0.25 | 0.200 | −0.31 | 0.164 |
| Prudent diet (factor 2) | ||||||||
| Model 1 | −0.26 | 0.001 | −0.19 | 0.029 | −0.24 | 0.005 | 0.03 | 0.707 |
| Model 2 | −0.19 | 0.019 | −0.18 | 0.073 | −0.15 | 0.098 | 0.13 | 0.191 |
| Model 3 | −0.24 | 0.009 | −0.22 | 0.034 | −0.09 | 0.332 | 0.25 | 0.021 |
Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, race, education, income, and marriage. Model 2 was adjusted for all covariates in model 1 plus smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, BMI, and total energy. Model 3 was adjusted for all covariates in model 2 plus mutual biomarkers (leptin, sICAM-1, CRP, and irisin). AHEI-2010, alternate healthy eating index-2010; CRP, C-reactive protein; DASH, dietary approaches to stop hypertension; sICAM-1, soluble intracellular adhesion molecule 1.