Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0139927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139927

Table 1. Characteristics of the Included Studies in the Meta-Analysis.

Authors and year of publication Country Study design Number of participants Mean age (years) Maximum follow-up year Adjusted confounders Methods used for controlling confounders Quality score
Khatod et al., 2015 [19] United States Cohort Users 2292 Nonusers 10 586 66.7 9.7 Age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, race, diabetic status, type of implant fixation, surgeon, hospital annual mean volume, surgeon arthroplasty fellowship training (Limited adjustment) Cox proportional hazards models 7
Prieto-Alhambra et al., 2014 [16] Denmark Cohort Users 1558 Nonusers 8966 75.6 10 Age, sex, joint replaced (hip/knee), year of primary hip/knee replacement surgery, marital status, working status, income, number of visits to general practitioners/specialists (in the previous year), a history of fracture (other than hip fracture), osteoarthritis, comorbidity, use of medications other than bisphosphonates, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, Charlson comorbidity index (Good adjustment) Propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards models 8
Prieto-Alhambra et al., 2011 [17] Unite Kingdom Cohort Users 1912 Nonusers 40 083 69.98 15 Age, sex, body mass index, type of joint replaced (hip/knee), year of joint replacement operation, recorded diagnosis of osteoarthritis, previous fracture before surgery, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, use of medications other than bisphosphonates, smoking status, alcohol intake, general practice deprivation score, location of surgery, comorbid conditions (Good adjustment) Propensity score-adjusted regression 8
Thillemann et al., 2010 [18] Denmark Case-control Cases 632 Controls 1264 >10 N/A Age, sex, marital status, education, income, location of surgery, year of primary total hip arthroplasty, medication other than bisphosphonates, comorbid chronic disease, Charlson comorbidity index, fixation technique (Good adjustment) Incidence-density matching, conditional logistic regression 8

N/A: not applicable