Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec 10;29(9):2794–2799. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4014-8

Table 4.

Adjusted differences between African-American and Caucasian patients and between Hispanic and Caucasian patients who proceeded with surgery

Odds ratios (95 % CI) Odds ratios (95 %
CI)
African-Americans versus
Caucasians
Hispanic versus
Caucasians
Age, a decade
 higher
0.9 (0.7, 1.1) 0.5 (0.4, 0.7)
Sex
 Male 0.5 (0.2, 1.3) 1.8 (0.8, 3.8)
 Female Ref Ref
BMI, 5 points
  higher
1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 0.9 (0.8, 1.2)
Income
 ≤$20,000 5.8 (1.8, 18.8) 16.0 (4.1, 62.4)
 $20,001–
  $60,000
7.2 (2.6, 20.0) 7.9 (2.2, 28.3)
 $60,001–
  $100,000
3.2 (1.1, 9.6) 4.3 (1.1, 16.3)
 >$100,000 Ref Ref
GERD 0.4 (0.2, 0.7)
Depression 0.4 (0.2, 0.7)
Anemia 4.8 (2.4, 9.6)

Results delineated in bold refers to statistically significant variables in the model at p < 0.05. Odds ratio refers to whether patients with that characteristic are more likely to belong to the minority group compared to the Caucasian group. When the demographics and significant co-morbidities were entered into the models, insurance and education were no longer significant and were dropped from the models