Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Apr 25;9(7):553–562. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.04.003

Table 7.

Longitudinal association between religiosity and cardiovascular biomarkers

Religiosity Adjusted β-Coefficients (95% Confidence Interval)
SBP DBP FBS HbA1c T-chol LDL–chol* HDL–chol TG
Not religious
at all
Reference
Slightly
religious
−0.16
(−0.44–0.12)
−0.07
(−0.24–0.11)
0.04
(−0.21–0.29)
−0.01
(−0.02–0.01)
0.53
(−0.03–1.09)
0.62
(0.13–1.11)
−0.07
(−0.28–0.13)
−0.28
(−1.66–1.11)
Somewhat
religious
−0.05
(−0.35–0.25)
0.01
(−0.18–0.20)
0.18
(−0.09–0.45)
−0.01
(−0.02–0.01)
0.41
(−0.20–1.02)
0.28
(−0.25–0.81)
−0.07
(−0.29–0.15)
1.08
(−0.42–2.58)
Religious −0.13
(−0.53–0.27)
−0.16
(−0.42–0.09)
−0.21
(−0.57–0.15)
0.00
(−0.02–0.01)
−0.26
(−1.07–0.56)
0.10
(−0.62–0.81)
−0.27
(−0.57–0.29)
−0.51
(−2.52–1.50)

BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL–chol, high–density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL–chol, low–density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; T–chol, total cholesterol.

Results in bold indicate statistically significant differences with a P–value less than 0.05

Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, occupation, health habits, BMI, and time variable. For analyses related to SBP and DBP, models were also adjusted for baseline blood pressure; for FBS and HbA1c, analyses were also adjusted for baseline diabetes related measures; and for the lipid outcomes, models were also adjusted for the respective baseline lipid level.

*

Indicates a statistical significance for the global P–value for each outcome