Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 8;5:14925. doi: 10.1038/srep14925

Table 6. Synergistic effect of miR-125b and classical risk factors in CHD patients and controls.

Classical risk miR-125b CHD Controls OR (95% CI) Pvalue
Age          
0 0 13 18 1 0.002
0 1 8 17 0.652(0.216 ~ 1.962) 0.446
1 0 12 13 1.278(0.443 ~ 3.691) 0.650
1 1 33 10 4.569(1.673 ~ 12.479) 0.003
Sex          
0 0 6 14 1 0.085
0 1 6 7 2.00(0.469 ~ 8.530) 0.349
1 0 19 17 2.608(0.819 ~ 8.309) 0.105
1 1 35 20 4.083(1.355 ~ 12.303) 0.012
CR          
0 0 12 22 1 0.016
0 1 14 16 1.604(0.587 ~ 4.381) 0.357
1 0 13 8 2.979(0.965 ~ 9.196) 0.058
1 1 26 10 4.767(1.731 ~ 13.130) 0.003
FBG          
0 0 13 24 1 0.017
0 1 21 20 1.938(0.779 ~ 4.822) 0.155
1 0 12 6 3.692(1.123 ~ 12.136) 0.031
1 1 18 6 5.538(1.764 ~ 17.391) 0.003
HDL-C          
0 0 10 21 1 0.009
0 1 16 18 1.867(0.680 ~ 5.126) 0.226
1 0 15 9 3.500(1.144 ~ 10.706) 0.028
1 1 23 8 6.037(2.006 ~ 18.173) 0.001

CR, creatinine; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL-C, fasting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

The value of each miRNA-125b means the relative mount calculated by 2−Δct method.