Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 26;54(4):3010–3018. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11412

Table 5.

Nuclear Opacity Progression* and Surgery Rates by Ethnicity, Age, and Sex


African-Americans
Caucasians
Males
Females
Males
Females
Age Group, y
Eyes at Risk
Incidence % (n)
Surgery % (n)
Eyes at Risk
Incidence % (n)
Surgery % (n)
Eyes at Risk
Incidence % (n)
Surgery % (n)
Eyes at Risk
Incidence % (n)
Surgery % (n)
65–69 10 30.0 (3) 0.0 (0) 24 20.8 (5) 0.0 (0) 54 44.4 (24) 5.6 (3) 91 30.8 (28) 6.6 (6)
70–74 21 23.8 (5) 9.5 (2) 31 19.4 (6) 6.5 (2) 84 30.1 (26) 5.9 (5) 119 26.9 (32) 5.9 (7)
75–79 20 10.0 (2) 5.0 (1) 40 30.0 (12) 0.0 (0) 76 34.2 (26) 10.5 (8) 89 24.7 (22) 9.0 (8)
≥80 10 20.0 (2) 20.0 (2) 19 26.3 (5) 10.5 (2) 38 15.8 (6) 7.9 (3) 48 16.7 (8) 12.5 (6)
Total 61 19.7 (12) 8.2 (5) 114 24.6 (28) 3.5 (4) 252 32.5 (82) 7.4 (19) 347 25.9 (90) 7.8 (27)
Overall by ethnicity Eyes at risk 175 Progression % (n) 22.9 (40) Surgery % (n) 5.1 (9) Eyes at risk 599 Progression % (n) 28.7 (172) Surgery % (n) 7.7 (46)
*

Nuclear progression: An increase of at least 0.3 units in eyes between 2.0 and 3.7 at baseline.

Note: In all, 87 eyes with baseline nuclear grade >3.7 not included on the table had surgery between visit 1 and visit 2; 291 eyes with baseline nuclear grade >3.7 and grades available in round 2 not included.