Table 5.
Moderator analyses
| Moderator | Attendance
|
Behavior
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k | ES (SE) | 95 % CI | k | ES (SE) | 95 % CI | |
| Age | ||||||
| Elementary | 3 | .06 (.04) | −.27, .38 | 3 | .07 (.12) | −.47, .62 |
| Middle | 7 | −.02 (.06) | −.20, .17 | 17 | .14 (.06) | −.01, .30 |
| Mixed | 5 | .07 (.03) | −.06, .21 | 19 | .15 (.26) | −.52, .83 |
| Contact | ||||||
| Weekly | 2 | −.22 (.26) | −3.49, 3.05 | 4 | .25 (.11) | −1.17, 1.67 |
| 3–4x/Week | 4 | .07 (.04) | −.06, .20 | 26 | .02 (.06) | −.13, .17 |
| Daily | 7 | −.01 (.05) | −.15, .15 | 13 | .21 (.26) | −.54, .95 |
| Control type | ||||||
| Wait list | 13 | .01 (.03) | −.05, .08 | 27 | .07 (.04) | −.04, .16 |
| TAU | 2 | .06 (.11) | −.15, .27 | 13 | .81 (.67) | −2.92, 1.77 |
| Alternative | 8 | −.19 (.37) | −2.16, 1.79 | |||
| Design | ||||||
| Random | 3 | .04 (.04) | −.30, .37 | 22 | .07 (.09) | −.23, .36 |
| Non-random | 13 | .04 (.03) | −.03, .11 | 27 | .14 (.11) | −.10, .38 |
| Program type | ||||||
| Local/regional | 9 | −.01 (.05) | −.14, .12 | 40 | .04 (.07) | −.11, .19 |
| National | 7 | .06 (.03) | −.02, .14 | 9 | .19 (.15) | −.19, .56 |
| Focus | ||||||
| Academic | 5 | .20 (.07) | −.40, .75 | |||
| Non-academic | 11 | −.04 (.26) | −1.04, .97 | |||
| Mixed | 32 | .11 (.12) | −.16, .38 | |||
| Publication | ||||||
| Published | 6 | .08 (.02) | .02, .14 | 34 | .14 (.06) | −.04, .32 |
| Unpublished | 10 | −.10 (.06) | −.24, .05 | 15 | .12 (.12) | −.15, .39 |
k Number of effect sizes, Focus moderator eliminated from the analysis for attendance outcomes due to missingness
TAU Treatment as usual, None of the moderator analyses revealed significant differences (p < .05)