Table 2. Results of the balanced fixed factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and results of the Tukey`s test for the fixed factor management system.

field of interest	parameter	treatment	int (means ± se)		org (means ± se)		biodyn(means ± se)		rootstock	block	year	date	interaction treatment:rootstock	interaction treatment:year	soil management	depth
growth	lateral leaf area [m2] per vine	***	4.26 ± 0.25	a	3.45 ± 0.29	b	2.95 ± 0.23	b	ns	ns	***	-	ns	ns
	Leaf area index (LAI) in 2012	***	2.44 ± 0.11	a	1.64 ± 0.07	b	1.72 ± 0.07	b	-	ns	-	-	-	-
	pruning weight [dt * ha-1]	***	44.9 ± 1.77	a	38.5 ± 0.97	b	37.4 ± 1.38	b	***	**	***	-	*	***
	relative chlorophyll content full-bloom	Ns	38.9 ± 0.45	-	38.2 ± 0.37	-	38.2 ± 0.31	-	***	*	***	-	ns	**
	relative chlorophyll content veraison	***	42.9 ± 0.43	a	41.5 ± 0.42	b	40.9 ± 0.47	b	**	**	***	-	ns	*
	relative chlorophyll content harvest	**	41.6 ± 0.73	a	40 ± 0.68	b	40.4 ± 0.75	b	**	**	***	-	ns	ns
nutrient status	Nmin [kg*ha-1] in soil	***	14.37 ± 1.67	b	21.44 ± 1.69	a	20.78 ± 1.54	a	-	ns	***	***	-	***	***	***
	nitrogen content in leaves [%] full-bloom	Ns	2.8 ± 0.03	-	2.77 ± 0.04	-	2.75 ± 0.04	-	**	ns	***	-	ns	*
	nitrogen content in leaves [%] veraison	*	2.1 ± 0.04	b	2.16 ± 0.04	a	2.16 ± 0.04	a	*	***	***	-	ns	*
	magnesium content in leaves [%] full-bloom	ns	0.22 ± 0.007	-	0.22 ± 0.004	-	0.21 ± 0.005	-	ns	***	***	-	ns	ns
	magnesium content in leaves [%] veraison	*	0.23 ± 0.008	a	0.22 ± 0.005	ab	0.21 ± 0.007	b	**	***	ns	-	ns	ns
physiologicalperformance	assimilation rate A [μmol CO2 m-2 s-1]	***	10.3 ± 0.35	a	8.5 ± 0.3	b	8.4 ± 0.32	b	ns	*	***	***	ns	*
	transpiration rate E [mmol m-2 s-1]	***	2.42 ± 0.12	a	1.98 ± 0.1	b	1.98 ± 0.1	b	**	*	***	***	ns	ns
	stomatal conductance gs [mmol H2O m-2 s-1]	***	117.84 ± 4.77	a	92.72 ± 3.88	b	90.27 ± 3.99	b	ns	***	***	***	ns	ns
	pre-dawn water potential Ψpd [MPa]	**	-0.2 ± 0.01	a	-0.21 ± 0.01	a	-0.23 ± 0.01	b	***	***	***	***	ns	*
yield	yield [kg * ha-1]	***	6984 ± 559	a	4276 ± 302	b	4347 ± 287	b	ns	ns	***	-	ns	***
	leaf-area-to-fruit-weight-ratio [cm2 * g-1] in 2012	Ns	25.11 ± 0.85	-	32.41 ± 3.2	-	32.94 ± 4.08	-	-	ns	-	-	-	-
	average single berry weight [g]	***	see Fig 4	a	see Fig 4	b	see Fig 4	b	***	ns	ns	***	ns	ns
	cluster weight [g] at veraison in 2012	**	122.29 ± 7.46	a	101.94 ± 9.37	b	91.92 ± 3.37	b	ns	*	-	-	*	-
	cluster length [cm] at veraison in 2012	ns	10.2 ± 0.34	-	10.02 ± 0.47	-	9.68 ± 0.28	-	ns	*	-	-	ns	-
	cluster compactness index [g*cm-2] at veraison in 2012	*	1.17 ± 0.04	a	1 ± 0.03	b	0.99 ± 0.05	b	ns	ns	-	-	ns	-
disease incidenceand severity	disease incidence/severity Plasmopara viticola	***	1.02 ± 0.01	b	2.02 ± 0.17	a	1.89 ± 0.15	a	ns	ns	***	-	ns	***
	disease incidence/severity Botrytis cinerea	**	4.49 ± 0.39	b	4.64 ± 0.41	ab	4.82 ± 0.42	a	ns	***	***	-	ns	*
	disease incidence sour rot [% infested clusters]	***	6.17 ± 1.42	a	0.83 ± 0.29	b	0.62 ± 0.29	b	ns	ns	***	-	ns	***
winegrape quality	total soluble solids [°Brix]	ns	see S2 Fig	-	see S2 Fig	-	see S2 Fig	-	ns	ns	ns	***	ns	ns
	total acidity [g*L-1]	ns		-		-		-	ns	ns	***	***	ns	ns
	pH	ns		-		-		-	ns	ns	***	***	ns	ns
	N-OPA	**	see Fig 4	b	see Fig 4	ab	see Fig 4	a	*	**	***	***	ns	***

*, ** and *** indicate statistical significance (p<0.05; p<0.01 and p<0.001) of the main effects determined by ANOVA (ns = not significant). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for the fixed factor management system determined by the Tukey`s test (int = integrated treatment, org = organic treatment, biodyn = biodynamic treatment).