Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 8;10(10):e0139940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139940

Table 3. Summary of Response Rates (Complete and Partial) of HAI, RE and TACE Stratified into Appropriate Subgroups for Comparison.

Response Rates
HAI RE TACE
Overall (95% CI) 48 (42–54) 36 (25–47) 29 (14–43)
Overall—Chemo naïve (95% CI) 52 (39–65) 90 (88–92) 90 a
Overall–Pretreated (95% CI) 35 (24–45) 32 (24–39) 28 (7–48)
HAT Alone (95% CI) 47 (38–55) 35 (24–45) 22 (4–41)
HAT + Sys (95% CI) 52 (41–64) 61 (16–100) 46 (22–70)
HAT Alone in Chemo naïve (95% CI) 53 (20–90) - -
HAT + Sys in Chemo naïve (95% CI) 51 (38–63) 90 (88–92) 90 a
HAT alone in pretreated (95% CI) 37 (20–55) 34.5 (24–45) 24 (0–49)
HAT +Sys in Pretreated (95% CI) 36 (14–58) 30 (10–48) -

- no data available.

a 1 study available for response data

HAT—hepatic artery based therapy; HAI–Hepatic artery infusion. RE- Radioembolization TACE—Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization. Sys—systemic chemotherapy