Table 1. Comparison of visual estimation by two raters, the ABC/2 method and od-values in terms of predicting infarct sizes > 100 and > 70 ml.
Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
For predicting lesion size > 100 ml | |||||
Rater 1 | 50 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 89 |
Rater 2 | 60 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 91 |
ABC/2 | 100 | 66 | 76 | 56 | 100 |
od-value 42 | 90 | 98 | 96 | 90 | 98 |
For predicting lesion size > 70 ml | |||||
Rater 1 | 53 | 100 | 86 | 100 | 83 |
Rater 2 | 87 | 91 | 90 | 81 | 94 |
ABC/2 | 100 | 83 | 86 | 59 | 100 |
od-value 42 | 93 | 89 | 90 | 78 | 97 |
Data for rater 1 and 2 and the ABC/2 method were obtained from the compiled dataset of 50 patients. Od-values are obtained from the day 1 and day 2 lesions of the whole cohort (n = 108 for day 1 and n = 88 for day 2).