Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep;7(9):1509–1517. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.07.38

Table 2. Complication rates of immediate and long term safety outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair are listed according to a recent meta-analysis (18), two registries (7,13) and the EVEREST II trial (9).

Complication rates Meta-analysis [Vakil et al. (18)] (%) ACCESS-EU [Maisano et al. (7)] (%) TRAMI [Wiebe et al. (13) (Euo score ≥20%/EuroSCORE <20%)] (%) EVEREST II [Whitlow et al. (9)] (%)
Procedural death 0.1 0 0
30-day mortality 4.2 3.4 4.3/1.1* (in hospital mortality) 7.7
All-cause mortality during follow-up 15.8 (mean follow-up 310 days) 17.3% (12–month follow-up) 13.4/9.6 (mean follow-up of 72 days) 24.4 (12–month follow-up)
Vascular complications needing intervention 1.0§
Major bleeding requiring transfusion 9.7§ 13.7/8.7* 17.9
Bleeding complications 3.9
Tamponade or significant pericardial effusion 0.7§ 1.1 1.1/1.6*
Emergent cardiac surgery 0.7§ 0.4 0.0
Non-fatal myocardial infarction 0.4§ 0.7 0.0/0.2* 2.6
Chordal rupture 0.8§
Single leaflet clip detachement 2.3§ 4.8 (diagnosed within 6 months)
Clip embolism 0.04§ 0.0
Hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke/TIA 1.3§ 0.7 0.7/0.0* 2.6
Acute renal failure 4.2§ 4.8 1.8/0.2* (dialysis at discharge) 3.8
Need for repeat MitraClip 1.6§ 3.4 1.8/1.6* 0.0

§, immediate safety outcomes; , data for 30-day follow up; *, data for in-hospital events. EVEREST II, Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study II trial; TRAMI, transcatheter mitral valve interventions.