Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 8;7(22):2404–2410. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i22.2404

Table 2.

Rates of fibrosis improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis treated with lamivudine, entecavir, or tenofovir

Ref. Publication year Nucleos(t)ide No. of patients Treatment duration Cirrhosis percentage Improvement ratio of fibrosis
Honkoop et al[8] 1997 LAM (25 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg) 13 6 mo Not described No difference in fibrosis was observed
Lai et al[3] 1998 LAM (25 mg, 100 mg, placebo) 358 52 wk 5% 25 mg (n = 72) 5%14
100 mg (n = 142) 2.5%14
Placebo (n = 143) 0%14
Suzuki et al[9] 1999 LAM (100 mg) 20 52 wk 0% All patients (n = 20) 35%1
Dienstag et al[10] 2003 LAM (100 mg, placebo) 63 1 yr + additional 2 yr 17% Bridging fibrosis (HAI fibrosis score of 3; n = 19)
63% (1 yr + additional 2 yr)2
Cirrhosis (HAI fibrosis score of 4; n = 11) 45.5% (1 yr)2; 72.7% (1 yr + additional 2 yr)2
Schiff et al[12] 2008 LAM (100 mg) 245 48 wk Not described5 ETV (n = 120) HBeAg+ 57%3
Entecavir (0.5 mg) HBeAg- 59%3
LAM (n = 125)
HBeAg+ 49%3
HBeAg- 53%3
Chang et al[13] 2010 ETV (0.5 mg) 57 48 wk, long-term (range: 3-7 yr, median: 6 yr) 7% All patients (n = 57) 32% (48 wk)3
88% (long-term)3
Cirrhosis (n = 4)
100% (long-term)3
Marcellin et al[14] 2012 TDF 348 5 yr 28% All patients (n = 348)
51% (5 yr)3
Cirrhosis (n = 97) 74% (5 yr)3
1

Fibrosis improvement was defined as an HAI fibrosis score decrease of at least 1-point;

2

Bridging fibrosis improvement was defined as achieving an HAI fibrosis score of 0 or 1. Cirrhosis improvement was defined as achieving an HAI fibrosis score of 0, 1, or 3;

3

Fibrosis improvement was defined as a decrease in the Ishak fibrosis score of at least 1-point;

4

Approximate value estimated from the published graph;

5

All patients had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (Ishak fibrosis scores of 4-6). LAM: Lamibudine; ETV: Entecavir; TDF: Tenofovir; HBeAg: Hepatitis B e antigen; HAI: Histologic activity index.