Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 12;4(8):e002099. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002099

Table 2.

EMS Use by Race/Ethnicity Among Male and Female Stroke Patients

Subgroup N EMS Use, % Unadjusted OR OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR* OR (95% CI)
Race/ethnicity and sex
 Men
  Male/black 36 403 57.9 0.91 (0.87 to 0.94) 1.00 (0.96 to 1.03)
  Male/Hispanic 16 646 52.2 0.72 (0.69 to 0.76) 0.77 (0.73 to 0.80)
  Male/Asian 6854 55.4 0.84 (0.79 to 0.89) 0.80 (0.75 to 0.85)
  Male/other 1105 58.9 1.04 (0.92 to 1.19) 1.09 (0.94 to 1.26)
  Male/white 136 773 57.0 (Reference) (Reference)
 Women
  Female/black 39 531 58.0 0.75 (0.72 to 0.77) 0.87 (0.84 to 0.91)
  Female/Hispanic 14 900 55.5 0.66 (0.63 to 0.69) 0.71 (0.67 to 0.74)
  Female/Asian 6318 57.2 0.74 (0.70 to 0.79) 0.71 (0.67 to 0.76)
  Female/other 1103 56.7 0.79 (0.69 to 0.91) 0.89 (0.76 to 1.04)
  Female/white 139 165 62.0 (Reference) (Reference)

EMS indicates emergency medical services; OR, odds ratio.

Adjusted model contains the following covariates: age, insurance, medical history, on-hours arrival, ability to ambulate at admission, initial examination findings, stroke type, and site characteristics. The race/ethnicity–sex interaction term was statistically significant (likelihood ratio chi-square 119.1, 4 degrees of freedom, P<0.001).