Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 9;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s12951-015-0127-z

Table 1.

Comparison between expression systems for the encapsulation of CYPBM3 inside P22

Expression system (plasmids) CYP/capsida Total CYPb
Abs280 (µM)
Active CYP
CO assayc (µM)
% active CYPd
(CO/Abs280)
Co-expression (pETDuet) 156.0 (±0.4) 123.5 9.2 7
Differential expression 1 (pBAD + pRSF) 129.5 (±0.1) 135.3 31.8 23
Differential expression 2 (pBAD + pRSF) 109.7 (±2.8) 123.7 42.9 35

aDetermined by Eq. 1

bTotal CYP determined using an extinction coefficient at 280 nm assuming a molar extinction coefficient ε280 = 44,920 M−1 cm−1 for coat protein and ε280 = 52,830 M−1 cm−1 for CYP-SP (theoretically calculated using ProtParam, Gasteiger, 2005). The concentration of protein was calculated using the Lambert–Beer equation, AbsT = CCP·ɛCPl + CCYP-SP·ɛCYP-SPl as described previously [15]

cActive CYP determined by the formation of CO-CYP complex in reducing medium with a extinction coefficient of ε450 = 0.091 nM−1cm−1 [26]

dActive/total CYP ratio expressed in percentage