Table 1.
Comparison between expression systems for the encapsulation of CYPBM3 inside P22
Expression system (plasmids) | CYP/capsida | Total CYPb
Abs280 (µM) |
Active CYP CO assayc (µM) |
% active CYPd
(CO/Abs280) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Co-expression (pETDuet) | 156.0 (±0.4) | 123.5 | 9.2 | 7 |
Differential expression 1 (pBAD + pRSF) | 129.5 (±0.1) | 135.3 | 31.8 | 23 |
Differential expression 2 (pBAD + pRSF) | 109.7 (±2.8) | 123.7 | 42.9 | 35 |
aDetermined by Eq. 1
bTotal CYP determined using an extinction coefficient at 280 nm assuming a molar extinction coefficient ε280 = 44,920 M−1 cm−1 for coat protein and ε280 = 52,830 M−1 cm−1 for CYP-SP (theoretically calculated using ProtParam, Gasteiger, 2005). The concentration of protein was calculated using the Lambert–Beer equation, AbsT = CCP·ɛCPl + CCYP-SP·ɛCYP-SPl as described previously [15]
cActive CYP determined by the formation of CO-CYP complex in reducing medium with a extinction coefficient of ε450 = 0.091 nM−1cm−1 [26]
dActive/total CYP ratio expressed in percentage