Abstract
Oxathiapiprolin is a new oomycide (piperidinyl thiazole isoxazoline class) discovered by DuPont which controls diseases caused by oomycete plant pathogens. It binds in the oxysterol-binding protein domain of Oomycetes. Growth chambers studies with detached leaves and potted plants showed remarkable activity of oxathiapiprolin against Pseudoperonospora cubensis in cucurbits. The compound affected all stages in the asexual life cycle of the pathogen. It inhibited zoospore release, cystospore germination, lesion formation, lesion expansion, sporangiophore development and sporangial production. When applied to the foliage as a preventive spray no lesions developed due to inhibition of zoospore release and cystospore germination, and when applied curatively, at one or two days after inoculation, small restricted lesions developed but no sporulation occurred. When applied later to mature lesions, sporulation was strongly inhibited. Oxathiapiprolin suppressed sporulation of P. cubensis in naturally-infected leaves. It exhibited trans-laminar activity, translocated acropetaly from older to younger leaves, and moved from the root system to the foliage. Seed coating was highly effective in protecting the developed cucumber plants against downy mildew. UV microscopy observations made with cucumber leaves infected with P. cubensis revealed that inhibition of mycelium growth and sporulation induced by oxathiapiprolin was associated with callose encasement of the haustoria.
Introduction
Downy mildew caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis is a major disease of cucurbits. It attacks cucumber, melon, squash, pumpkin and various gourds [1,2]. The pathogen has undergone major changes during the last decade. Disease severity and epidemics became far more destructive and new genotypes made disease control through host plant resistance ineffective. Consequently, disease control relies mainly on oomycides applications [3,4]. Sixteen chemical classes with different modes of action are available for the control oomycete plant pathogens (www.frac.info). The three most important single-site compounds are Phenylamides (PAs), Quinone outside Inhibitors (QoIs) and Carboxylic Acid Amides (CAAs) [5].
Resistance to single-site oomycides has developed in many oomycete plant pathogens including P. cubensis. Isolates resistant to mefenoxam and strobilurins [6] were found in US fields [7,8]. Resistance was also reported for cymoxanil and propamocarb [9,10].
Resistance to PAs in P. cubensis was discovered in Israel two years after introduction of metalaxyl [11] and thereafter in other countries [10,12,13]. PA-resistant isolates in Israel possessed higher competitive fitness [14] and exhibited much reduced sensitivity to mancozeb compared to PA-sensitive isolates [15]. They remained predominant in the population after metalaxyl was abandoned [16]. Most P. cubensis isolates collected during 2008–2011 in Israel and the USA were resistant to PA [17]. Pathotype 6 is a new comer in Israel [14]; resistance to PA is common on cucumber and melon attacked by pathotype 3, but rare on squash, pumpkin and butternut gourd which are attacked by pathotype 6 (Y. Cohen, A.E. Rubin and L. Falach, unpublished data). Resistance to PA was found among isolates of P. cubensis collected in China in 2012, Vietnam in 2013 and India in 2014 [3]. Varying frequencies of PA resistant isolates were detected in the Czech Republic between 2005 and 2009 [10,13].
QoI resistant P. cubensis isolates (carrying G143A mutation) were detected in Japan by Ishii et al. [18]. High frequencies of QoI resistance occurs in Israel and many other locations [13], especially in the East Coast of the USA (QoI FRAC working group minutes, 2014, www.frac.info).
Resistance to CAAs in P. cubensis is associated with two different amino acid exchanges in its target protein, CesA3: at position G1105V (glycine for valine, in Israeli isolates) and at position G1105W (glycine for tryptophan, in USA isolates) [19,20]. Both mutations confer cross resistance among CAAs [20]. Resistance of P. cubensis to CAAs was reported in the West Coast of the USA, Israel and China (CAA FRAC working group, www.frac.info; [21]. Isolates collected in Vietnam and Russia were all sensitive to CAAs (Y. Cohen, unpublished data).
The build-up of resistances to single-site oomycides has accelerated the search for anti-oomycete compounds with new modes of action. Two such novel compounds became recently available: ametoctradin (Quinone QoSI inhibitor of the respiratory chain) binding to the mitochondrial bc1 complex III [22–24], and oxathiapiprolin (inhibitor of oxysterol-binding protein) [25]. Sweigard et al. [25] reported on identification of the oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) as the target protein of this oomycide. Recent studies showed that oxathiapiprolin is effective against downy mildew in basil caused Peronospora belbahrii [26,27], black shank in tobacco caused by Phytophthora nicotianae [28], P. capsici in bell pepper [29–31] and downy mildew in sunflower caused by Plasmopara halstedii [32]. No studies are available on the activity of oxathiapiprolin against other oomycetes including P. cubensis.
The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the new anti-oomycete compound oxathiapiprolin (piperidinyl thiazole isoxazoline class) against P. cubensis. The specific objective was to investigate the effect of oxathiapiprolin on the various stages in the asexual life cycle of P. cubensis, the agent of downy mildew in Cucurbitaceae. A preliminary report on some findings was given before [33].
Methods and Materials
Oomycide
Oxathiapiprolin (DPX-QGU42-10OD, 10% active ingredient formulated as oil dispersion) was obtained from DuPont De Numerous. It was suspended in water to produce a stock suspension of 1mg/ml (1000 mg/l). Tenfold serial dilution was made to prepare 0.0001 to 100 mg/l suspensions. All concentrations are given as mg/l active ingredient (a.i.).
Pathogen
Most experiments were performed with cucumber inoculated with isolate 83c of P. cubensis (pathotype 3, mating type A1, resistant to mefenoxam, dimethomorph, mandipropamid and azoxysrrobin). The effect of oxathiapiprolin on infection and disease development of cucumber was also tested with additional 25 isolates of the pathogen of various origins, pathotypes, mating types and oomycide-resistance profiles (Table 1). In some experiments, other cucurbit hosts (see below) were used for experiments in the manner described for cucumber. Isolates were maintained by repeated inoculations of detached leaves of cucumber in growth chambers at 15°C (14h light/day). Sporangia were removed from freshly sporulating leaves into distilled water kept on ice, adjusted to 2000 sporangia/ml, and used for inoculation. In some experiments sporangial suspensions were used for in-vitro testing of zoospore release, zoospore motility, zoospore encystment and cystospore germination.
Table 1. Origin and characteristics of 26 isolates of Pseudoperonospora cubensis used in this study.
Number | Isolate | Country | Host | Year | Pathotype a | Mating type | Oomycide resistance b | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFX | MPD | AZX | OXA | |||||||
1 | PCHS | Japan | Unknown | 1980 | 3 | A1 | S | S | S | S |
2 | 8904 | Israel | Cucumber | 2004 | 3 | A1 | R | S | nt | S |
3 | 19 | Israel | Melon | 2007 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
4 | US-163 | USA | Watermelon | 2008 | 5 | A1 | R | R | nt | S |
5 | 42R | Israel | Cucumber | 2008 | 3 | A2 | R | R | R | S |
6 | 34 | Israel | Cucumber | 2009 | 3 | A1 | R | S | S | S |
7 | 13 | Israel | Squash | 2010 | 6 | A2 | S | S | S | S |
8 | 81 | Spain | Cucumber | 2011 | 3 | A1 | R | R | nt | S |
9 | 83c | Spain | Cucumber | 2011 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
10 | 98P | Israel | Pumpkin | 2011 | 6 | A2 | I | S | S | S |
11 | 101D | Israel | Butter gourd | 2011 | 6 | A2 | I | S | S | S |
12 | 172S | Israel | Pumpkin | 2012 | 6 | A2 | R | S | S | S |
13 | Harbin 10P | China | Cucumber | 2012 | 7 | A2 | R | R | S | S |
14 | 197c | Israel | Cucumber | 2013 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
15 | BH | Israel | Cucumber | 2013 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
16 | 14-RO-06 | Romania | Cucumber | 2014 | 3 | A1 | nt | nt | nt | S |
17 | 14-ES-24 | Spain | Cucumber | 2014 | 3 | A1 | R | S | nt | S |
18 | 14-GR-02 | Greece | Cucumber | 2014 | 3 | A1 | R | S | R | S |
19 | c3-mpd1000 | Israel | Cucumber | 2014 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
20 | c1-azx1000 | Israel | Cucumber | 2014 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
21 | Luf-2 | India | Luffa | 2014 | 10 | A2 | S | S | S | S |
22 | Ash-1 | India | Ash gourd | 2014 | 10 | A2 | S | S | S | S |
23 | Ger-1 | Germany | Pumpkin | 2014 | 6 | A2 | S | S | S | S |
24 | 227-c | Israel | Cucumber | 2015 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
25 | 229P | Israel | Pumpkin | 2015 | 6 | A2 | S | S | S | S |
26 | 231-c | Israel | Cucumber | 2015 | 3 | A1 | R | R | R | S |
a After Cohen et al, 2015
b MFX = mefenoxam; MPD- mandipropamid; AZ = azoxystrobin; OXA = oxathiapiprolin.
For MFX: S = sensitive, ED50 ≤ 1 mg/l; I = intermediate, ED50 1-10mg/l; R = resistant, ED50 ≥100mg/l.
For MPD and AZX: S = sensitive, ED50 ≤ 1 mg/l; R = resistant, ED50 ≥10mg/l.
For OXA: S = ED50< 0.0001 mg/l.
nt = not tested
Plants
Cucumber plants (cv. Nadiojni or SMR-18) were used in most experiments. In some experiments, melon (cv. AY), squash (cv. Beruti), pumpkin (cv. Tripoli), butternut gourd (cv. Dalorit), watermelon (cv. Malali), bottle gourd (local cultivar) and ridge gourd (cv. SV) were used. Plants were grown in the greenhouse and used when reached the 2–3 leaf stage (3–4 weeks after sowing). Most assays were conducted with detached leaves, but some were done with whole potted plants or plants grown in net-houses.
Preventive treatment and inoculation
Detached leaves were placed on moistened filter paper in 14 cm Petri dishes lower surface uppermost (unless stated otherwise). They were sprayed with oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations with the aid of a fine glass atomizer. Leaves sprayed with water served as controls. At 2-3h after spray, leaves were drop inoculated with sporangia of P. cubensis (400 sporangia per 20 μl, 20 droplets per leaf, unless stated otherwise). Inoculated leaves were incubated in a growth chamber at 20°C (12h light/day, 60 μmole. m2.s-1) and evaluated for disease development at 7 dpi (days post inoculation), unless stated otherwise.
Inoculation and curative treatment
Detached leaves were placed on moistened filter paper inside 14 cm Petri dishes lower surface upper-most and drop inoculated with sporangia of P. cubensis in the manner described above. The inoculated leaves were incubated in a growth chamber at 20°C as above and sprayed at 1–6 (dpi) with water (control) or oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations.
Sporulation in naturally-infected leaves
Cucumber leaves, naturally-infected with P. cubensis, were collected at 8 am from Net-house 1 on campus on April 27 and May 1, 2015. Leaves were brought to the laboratory and the sporangia they carried were blown away in a laminar hood with the aid of a strong stream of compressed air. Leaves (n = 4) were laid upper surface uppermost on wet filter in 14 cm Petri dishes and sprayed with water (control) or oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations. Leaves were incubated at 20°C under light (100 μmole.m2.s-1) until 17 pm, the number of lesions counted (ranged from 120–180 per leaf) and then placed at 18°C in the dark for 16h to allow for sporulation. The sporangia produced were collected with a fine water jet into a beaker, their concentration was determined with the aid of a cytometer and the number of sporangia produced per lesion was calculated.
Similar experiments were conducted with naturally-infected leaves collected on June 9 and June 14, 2015 from Net-house 3 located at Bar-Ilan Farm. In these leaves, downy mildew lesions occupied the whole leaf area. Therefore, sporangial number was determined in 12 mm leaf discs removed from each leaf (n = 3). Leaf discs were placed in 3 ml water containing 0.01% Tween-20, agitated on Vortex (high speed for 1 minute), the number of sporangia was determined with the aid of a cytometer, and the number of sporangia produced per 1cm2 leaf tissue was calculated.
The effect of oxathiapiprolin on sporulation of P. cubensis in naturally-infected cucumber plants was tested directly in Net-house 3. Downy mildew-infected plants (n = 10) were sprayed at 3 weeks after inoculation with oxathiapiroplin (3 mg/l ai) at 8 am 11.6.2015 while control plants (n = 10) were left untreated. Leaves (one per plant) were collected at 8 am 12.6.2015 (night was dewy). Leaves were brought to the laboratory, photographed, and the intensity of sporulation was visually estimated (0–3 scale, with 0 = no visible sporulation; 1 = weak sporulation; 2 = moderate sporulation; and 3 = heavy sporulation).
Translaminar movement
The following experiments were performed to learn if oxathiapiprolin can translocate from one surface of the leaf to the opposite (thereafter inoculated) surface of that leaf. Detached leaves (n = 3) of cucumber were laid in 14 cm Petri dishes on wet filter paper lower or upper surface uppermost. Leaves were sprayed with oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations and two hours later were drop-inoculated with sporangia (15 droplets, 25 μl each) on the treated surface or on the opposite, untreated surface. Leaves were incubated at 18°C in the dark for 20h to allow for infection and then at 20°C (12h light/day) to enable lesion development. Number and size of lesions was determined at 7 and 14dpi.
Translocation form leaves or hypocotyl
The following experiments were performed to learn if oxathiapiprolin translocates acropetally from a treated leaf 1 to the newly developed leaf 2. Cucumber plants having one true leaf (n = 3) were either sprayed on that leaf or treated with 10 droplets (25 μl each) of oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations. Control plants were left untreated. Plants were then incubated at 20°C (12h light/day) for 4 days to allow the second true leaf to expand. Plants were then spray-inoculated with the pathogen and disease development on the treated leaf 1 and the untreated leaf 2 was recorded at 7dpi.
In other experiments, oxathiapiprolin was applied as a fine spray to the hypocotyl of horizontally-laid 2-leaf plants (n = 6). To avoid contact with other organs, leaves were covered with a plastic bag and the soil surface covered with aluminum foil. Control plants remained untreated. Plants were inoculated at 6h after treatment and were evaluated for disease development at 7dpi.
Translocation from the root
Plants (n = 6) at the 2-leaf stage growing in 200 ml pots were irrigated to soil capacity and thereafter drenched around the stem base with 1 ml oxathiapiprolin of 100 mg/l. Plants were thereafter irrigated twice, at 4h intervals, with 5 ml tap water to facilitate the distribution of the oxathiapiprolin through the root system. Plants were incubated at 20°C (12h light/day) and inoculated one day after treatment. Disease records were taken at 7dpi.
Seed coating
One hundred cucumber seeds (2g) were mixed with 100 mg oxathiapirolin 10%. The mixture was rotated at 200 rpm for 1h and the seeds were allowed to rest on the bench for 10 days. The coated seeds weighed 2.04 g, indicating that each seed was coated with approximately 40 μg active ingredient of oxathiapiprolin. Plants were raised from control and coated seeds and were spray-inoculated P. cubensis at the 1-leaf 2-leaf or 3- leaf stage. A week later the number of lesions produced was counted on each plant (n = 10).
In-vitro assays
One ml aliquots of sporangial suspensions in 20 ml vials were supplemented with oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations (n = 3), kept on ice for 30 min and then on the bench to allow for zoospore release. Zoospore release and motility were examined in 10 μl droplets at a magnification of x63.
Temporary exposure of sporangia to oxathiapiprolin was tested as follows: sporangia were suspended in water or oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations. After 15 minutes, they were washed with excessive water over 8μ Millipore membrane and re-suspended in fresh water. Zoospore release was examined microscopically at x63 after 2 hours.
Motile zoospores in depression glass slides were amended with oxathiapiprolin of various concentrations (or water) and sucrose to final concentration of 0.1M. Slides were incubated inside moisten Petri dishes at 18°C in the dark. Cystospore germination was examined after 15 h at x63.
Microscopy
The procedures described by Cohen et al. [34,35] were employed. One cm diameter leaf discs were removed from the test leaves at various time intervals after inoculation or fungicidal treatment. Leaf discs were placed in 5 ml ethanol and boiled for 5 minutes to clarify. The ethanol was discarded and 5 ml of 0.01% aniline blue solution (in 0.1M dibasic-potassium phosphate pH 8.9 buffer) were added. The vials containing the leaf discs were placed at 4°C overnight. The leaf discs were then removed, placed on glass slides, lower surface upper-most, treated with 10μl of 0.01% calcofluor solution (Sigma), covered with a cover slip and examined with aid of Olympus A70 epifluorescent microscope. Electron micrographs were produced with the aid of Phillips SEM after standard processing of the infected tissue.
Data analysis
Experiments with detached leaves and potted plants were repeated twice. In vitro experiments were repeated three times. Results from the repeated experiments showed little variation. Data from repeated experiments were averaged and the mean and standard deviation values were calculated. Analysis of variance was done using JMP® software (SAS Institute). Significant difference between means were calculated for α = 0.05 using Tukey’s-Kramer HSD (honest significant difference) test.
Results
Efficacy in vitro
Zoospore release
Oxathiapiprolin had a strong inhibitory effect on zoospore release from sporangia in vitro. The mean number of motile zoospores (±SD) counted per microscope field at x63, at 1.5h after addingoxathiapirolin, was 1400±350, 5.5±6.4, 1.5±2.1, 0.5±0.7, and 0 at oxathiapiprolin concentrations of 0, 0.00001, 0.0001, 0.001 and 0.01 mg/l, respectively.
Temporary exposure of sporangia to oxathiapiprolin
Control sporangia in water released a mean of 2000±450 motile zoospores in 10μl suspension. Sporangia continuously exposed to 0.00001 mg/l oxathiapiprolin released 20±30 motile zoospores and sporangia temporarily exposed to 0.00001 mg/l oxathiapiprolin released 200±50 motile zoospores. Exposure to 0.001 mg/l oxathiapiprolin for 15 minutes was totally inhibitory to zoospore release, suggesting that oxathiapiprolin may bind quickly and irreversibly to its target in the pathogen.
Effect of oxathiapiprolin on zoospore motility
The oomycide had a weak effect on zoospore motility. At 30 min after adding it to motile zoospore suspension the proportion of halted zoospores was reduced by 25, 50 and 75%, at oxathiapiprolin of 0.0005, 0.05 and 5 mg/l, respectively.
Cystospore germination
Oxathiapiprolin had a strong inhibitory effect on cystospore germination in vitro. In various experiments, percent germinating cystospores in water amended with 0.1M sucrose ranged from 20 to 30%, as against 0% in oxathiapiprolin of 0.0001 mg/l (Fig 1A–1D).
Efficacy in vivo
Zoospore release and cystospore germination
Control-untreated and oxathiapiprolin-treated cucumber leaves were drop-inoculated with sporangia, incubated at 20°C for one or two days and thereafter examined microscopically. Cystospores germinated nicely at 1 dpi on the surface of control untreated inoculated leaves and germ-tubes grew over the stomatal opening (Fig 1A, 1C and 1E). In oxathiapiprolin-treated (0.0001 mg/l) leaves no germinating cystospores were seen (Fig 1B, 1D and 1F). Extensive mycelium growth inside the control leaves was observed at 2 dpi (Fig 1G) while no visible mycelium growth was seen in the treated leaves (Fig 1H) due to the lack of zoospores release and/or cystospore germination.
Infection and sporulation in detached leaves and potted plants
The effect of a preventive application in detached leaf assays is demonstrated in Fig 2A (cucumber) and Fig 2B (melon). Treatment with oxathiapiprolin of 0.0001–0.001 mg/l totally inhibited disease development, conforming that no penetration has taken place due to the fact that oxathiapiprolin avoided zoospore release and/or cystospore germination. Preventive spray with oxathiapiprolin was highly effective against downy mildew in melon leaf discs. Percent area infected in leaf discs (4 cm diameter) treated with oxathiapiprolin of 0, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/l was 97.8±4.4, 4.4±6.8, 2.2±5.1, 0, 0, and 0%, respectively (Fig 2C).
A series of experiment were performed to explore whether isolates of P. cubensis of various origins and characteristics differ in their sensitivity to oxathiapiprolin. All 26 isolates listed in Table 1, regardless of their origin, pathotype, mating type or sensitivity to other oomycides, produced no lesions when drop-inoculated onto detached cucumber leaves preventively-treated with oxathiapiprolin of 0.0001 mg/l. A1 and A2 isolates were similarly controlled by 0.0001 mg/l of the compound (Fig 2D and 2E). Similarly, the isolates belonging to pathotypes 5, 6, and 10 produced no lesions when drop-inoculated onto detached leaves of their respective hosts watermelon, squash or ridge gourd, respectively, when treated with oxathiapiprolin of 0.0001 mg/l before inoculation.
In potted plants, the detrimental effect of oxathiapiprolin on infection was significantly expressed at ≥ 0.001 mg/l. Two leaf plants were sprayed with oxathiapiprolin on the upper leaf surface and 3h later were spray-inoculated on the upper leaf surface with sporangia of P. cubensis. Disease records (taken at 7dpi) showed a mean of 383±76 downy mildew lesions per plant in the controls; this number decreased by 96 and 100%, respectively relative to control, at oxathiapiprolin of 0.001 and 1 mg/l, respectively (Fig 3A and 3B).
The differential effects of oxathiapiprolin in preventive vs curative application is demonstrated in Fig 4. The compound, applied preventively (time zero) at a low dose of 0.0001 mg/l, totally prevented symptom production (Fig 4A upper panel), whereas when applied at 1 or 2dpi, symptoms were produced even at a dose of up to 0.01 mg/l (Fig 4A middle and lower panels). Very slight effect on lesion appearance was seen in leaves treated with oxathiapiprolin at 3dpi, even with a high of 10 mg/l (Fig 4B).
While oxathiapiprolin applied before inoculation suppressed zoospore release and/or cyst germination and therefore inhibited lesion formation, oxathiapiprolin applied after inoculation suppressed lesion expansion, sporangiophore formation and sporangial yield, depending on the time of its application.
Data in Fig 5A present lesion size in leaves treated with oxathiapiprolin at 0, 1, 2 or 3dpi. No lesions appeared at 0 dpi at ≥ 0.0001 mg/l oxathiapiprolin. At 1–3 dpi, suppression of lesion expansion was significantly stronger as the dose of the oomycide was higher. Higher doses were required at 3dpi compared to 2 or 1dpi (note the change in the dose values). Data in Fig 5B show that sporangiophore formation in such lesions was strongly suppressed. Thus, no sporangiophores were produced in leaves treated with the compound at 0 or 1dpi. Their number decreased significantly in a dose-dependent manner at 2 or 3dpi. The fluorescent micrographs presented in Fig 6A and 6B show that at increasing doses, oxathiapiprolin prevented sporangial formation, sporangiophore ramification or sporangiophore emergence from stomata.
In the experiments shown in Fig 7, detached leaves were treated with oxathiapiprolin at 2 or 5 dpi and the numbers of sporangia (Fig 7A) or sporangiophores (Fig 7B) produced were counted at 7 dpi. Sporangial yield was reduced by 88, 99 and 99.8% in leaves treated at 2 dpi with oxathiapiprolin of 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/l, respectively (Fig 7A). The number of sporangiophores in leaves treated at 5dpi was reduced by 84, 95.4 and 100% with oxathiapiprolin of 0.1, 1 and 10 mg/l, respectively (Fig 7B). A visual illustration of such inhibition is given in the fluorescent micrographs presented in Fig 7C and 7D. While abundant sporangiophores and sporangia were produced in the control leaves (Fig 7C) no such organs were produced in leaves treated at 5 dpi with oxathiapiprolin of 1 mg/l (Fig 7D). Oxathiapiprolin induced heavy callose encasement of the haustoria colonizing the mesophyll which probably interferes with nutrients flow from the attacked host cells into the mycelia during sporogenesis.
Sporulation in naturally infected leaves
Oxathiapiprolin adversely affected sporulation in naturally-infected leaves of cucumber after were treated in the laboratory. Data presented in Fig 8 show 69–96% inhibition of sporulation in leaves collected from Net-house 1 on April 27, 2015 and May 1, 2015 (Fig 8A) and 95–99% inhibition in leaves collected from Net-house 3 on June 9, 2015 and June 14, 2015 (Fig 8B). A visual representation of such inhibition is provided in Fig 8C (control) and 8D (oxathiapirolin of 0.0001 mg/l applied June 9).
Oxathiapirolin of 3 mg/l strongly suppressed sporulation of P. cubensis when was applied (June 11, 2015) to downy mildew-infected cucumber plants in Net-house 3. Sporulation index (visual scale 0–3) in control leaves at one day after application ranged from 2–3 (2.75±0.35) as against 0–0.3 (0.08±0.10) in oxathiapirolin treated leaves (Fig 9).
Translaminar activity of oxathiapiprolin
Oxathiapiprolin exhibited translaminar properties: detached leaves sprayed with 0.0001–1 oxathiapiprolin mg/l and thereafter drop-inoculated with P. cubensis on the treated leaf surface (upper/upper or lower/lower) showed complete control of the disease at all doses at both 7 and 14dpi. Control inoculated leaves produced 15 lesions per leaf whose size ranged from 21–26 mm at 7 dpi and from 25–35 mm at 14dpi. Complete control of the disease was also seen in leaves treated with 0.001–1 mg/l, regardless of the surface treated/ inoculated (upper/lower, or lower/upper). However, at the lowest dose of 0.0001 mg/l, leaves treated/inoculated on opposite surfaces produced at 7dpi 8–10 lesions per leaf with a size of 4–4.5 mm and at 14dpi 11.5–13.5 lesions per leaf with a size of 4.3–5.4 mm (Fig 10), indicating on partial translaminar movement of the compound when applied at a low concentration.
Systemic translocation of oxathiapiprolin
Oxathiapiprolin exhibited acropetal systemic mobility in cucumber plants. When sprayed at 50 or 100 mg/l to leaf 1, both leaf 1 and the newly-developed leaf 2 were fully protected against downy mildew whereas the control untreated inoculated plants developed 260±50 lesions per plant (Fig 11A). When droplets containing 10 mg/l were applied to leaf 1, the treated leaf 1 was fully protected but leaf 2 showed no protection (Fig 11B). However, application of droplets containing 100 or 1000 mg/l oxathiapiprolin were fully protective to both leaf 1 and leaf 2 (Fig 11B). A spray of 1 or 10 mg/l applied to the hypocotyl resulted with no protection of the leaves relative to the control plants but a spray of 100 mg/l provided full protection against the disease (Fig 11C). Oxathiapiprolin applied as a soil drench to the root system (1 ml, 100 mg/l) supplied full protection against the disease (Fig 11D).
Seed coating
Seed coating had no impact on percent germination or growth rate of cucumber plants compared to uncoated seeds. Downy mildew development was dramatically suppressed in plants developed from coated seeds relative to plants developed from regular seeds. Number of lesions per plant in control untreated-inoculated plants at the 1-leaf, 2-leaf and 3-leaf stage was 70±25, 180±54 and 375±28, respectively as against 0, 0 and 1.0±1.7 in coated-seed plants, respectively. All lesions in 3-leaf plants developed in leaf 3; no lesions developed in leaves 1 or 2.
Discussion
Management of downy mildew in cucurbits relies mainly on oomycidesdeployment. Disease outbreaks became more frequent and more severe since 2002 in Israel [33,36], 2004 in the USA [4,37] and 2009 in Europe [1]. The appearance of new aggressive pathotypes with expanded host range and mating capability seems to be responsible for this resurgence of P. cubensis [1,36,38]. In the USA, the long-standing genetic resistance in cucumber provided by the dm-1 gene became no longer effective in 2004, probably due to the migration of new pathotypes via seeds [39]. In many countries, including Israel, the pathogen developed resistance against phenylamides (e.g. metalaxyl, mefenoxam), carboxyl acid amides (CAAs, e.g. dimethomorph, mandipropamid) and strobilurins (e.g. azoxystrobin) [5–10,13,19–21,40,41].
Oxathiapiprolin is a new oomycide, with a novel mode of action. As shown here, it is capable of controlling isolates of P. cubensis resistant PA, QoI and CAAs. We have examined the inhibitory effects of oxathiapiprolin on almost every stage in the asexual life cycle of P. cubensis. Oxathiapiprolin allowed the cleavage of the zoospores inside the sporangium during zoosporogenesis (not shown) but suppressed their discharge from the sporangium. Similar inhibition of zoospore release was observed with P. capsici [30]. Inhibition of zoospore release was almost complete both in vitro and in vivo on leaf surface. When added to motile zoospores in vitro oxathiapiprolin had a weak negative effect on the speed or duration of their motility, suggesting that it does not hamper the energy supply required by the locomotive machinery of the zoospore. Oxathiapiprolin enhanced the disintegration of zoospores in vitro and in vivo, causing rupture of their membrane. No quantitative figures are available on this aspect.
The most pronounced effect of oxathiapiprolin was its inhibitory effect on cystospore germination. Very low doses of the compound were required to completely avoid germination of the cystospores either in vitro or in vivo. Similar inhibition of cystospore germination was observed in vitro with P. capsici [29,30]. The biochemical mechanism(s) responsible for this inhibition is not known. CAA fungicides, which target the cellulose synthase CesA3 protein of oomycetes [19] are also strong inhibitors of cystospore germination but the dose required is x100 higher compared to oxathiapiprolin [42].
Oxathiapiprolin targets oxysterol-binding proteins in oomycetes [25]. Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP)-related proteins (ORPs) are lipid-binding proteins implicated in many cellular processes including signaling, vesicular trafficking, lipid metabolism, and non-vesicular sterol transport [43]. It might occur that oxathiapiprolin affects cellulose micro-fibrils trafficking towards the tip membrane of the germinating cystospore, thus preventing germ-tube emergence.
The effect of oxathiapiprolin on downy mildew development was strongly dependent on the time of its application relative to the inoculation event. When applied preventively before inoculation, oxathiapirolin totally prevented disease production whereas when applied after inoculation it enabled disease development but reduced lesion expansion and sporangiophore/sporangia production, probably due to the inhibition of mycelium growth.
Because cystospore germination is inhibited in vivo, no stomatal penetration could take place and no lesions of downy mildew were produced in leaves treated preventively with oxathiapiprolin. All 26 isolates used in this study exhibit similar high sensitivity to the compound, regardless of the host used for inoculation, suggesting on high expected efficacy against a variety of pathotypes known to prevail in various locations around the globe [4,33]. Very low doses of the compound were required to avoid lesion formation, the lowest dose known in the oomycides world. This is a great advantage of this oomycide but at the same time may turn it into a high-risk oomycide in terms of resistance.
Oxathiapiprolin possess curative effects against P. cubensis. When applied to already-infected leaf tissue it induces callose encasement of the haustoria. Callose encasement of haustoria was implicated in genetic resistance of melon against P. cubensis [35] and in resistance induced by DL-β amino-butyric acid (BABA) against Bremia lactucae in lettuce [44]. Such encasement may starve the pathogen, lead to cessation of mycelium growth and restrict lesion expansion. Lesion expansion arrest was also reported for metalaxyl, but it lasted for only one or two days after inoculation [45] as compared to 3 days with oxathiapiprolin.
Oxathiapiprolin also exhibited anti-sporulative effect against P. cubensis. When applied to artificially inoculated leaves at the terminal phase of disease development it strongly suppressed sporangiophore emergence from stomata and therefore no sporangia were formed. When applied in the laboratory to naturally-infected leaves a strong suppression of sporangial production was obtained with 0.0001 mg/l of the compound. Infected plants treated in the field with 3 mg/l of oxathiapiprolin failed to sporulate, suggesting a “knock-down” effect of the compound. A strong anti-sporulation activity of oxathiapiprolin was reported for P. capsici in vitro [29,30]. Other oomycides (e.g. phenylamides, CAAs) exhibit anti-sporulation effects but the doses required are higher compared to oxathiapiprolin [42,45].
Oxathiapiprolin is shown here to translocate acropetally in cucumber plants. When applied to the root system or to the hypocotyl, leaves were protected against downy mildew. When was applied to leaf 1, leaf 2 was protected. However, relatively high doses were required to achieve such protection (50–100 mg/l) indicating on partial mobility (or degradation) of oxathiapiprolin in the plant. Systemic protection by soil drench was also observed in potted tomato plants against late blight and in basil plants against downy mildew (Y. Cohen, unpublished data). Soil application of oxathiapiprolin was effective against P. nicotianae in tobacco [46].
Oxathiapiprolin exhibited excellent activity against P. cubensis when applied as seed dressing (~40 μg per seed). Plants developed from such seeds were fully protected against downy mildew at the 1, 2, and 3 true leaf stage, suggesting on effective mobility from the embryo to the developing seedling. Using radiolabeled oxathiapiprolin may provide better insight on the uptake, mobility and degradation of the compound in the plant (e.g. see [47] for 14C-cymoxanil). Oxathiapiprolin applied as seed treatment was already reported to control downy mildew in basil [27].
Oxathiapiprolin exhibits remarkable translaminar movement across the leaf lamina. At concentration of ≥ 0.001 mg/l disease was completely controlled regardless of whether the inoculum was applied to the treated or the untreated leaf surface. Only at the lowest dose used of 0.0001 mg/l one could distinguished that translaminar movement of the compound was partial.
In conclusion: oxathiapiprolin, a novel oomycide with a new mode of action, is highly effective in controlling downy mildew in cucurbits caused by P. cubensis. It was effective against various pathotypes, mating types, and oomycide-resistant isolates. It is effective against all stages in the asexual life cycle of the disease. It possesses preventive and curative properties. It shows excellent translaminar mobility and partial acropetal systemicity.
The availability of oxathiapiprolin to the farmers may now improve significantly their ability to combat this devastating downy mildew disease of cucurbits. To avoid possible resistance build up in P.cubensis, oxathiapiprolin should be mixed with unrelated oomycide (s) before applied in the field.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Dr. Avia E. Rubin and Dr. Avi Jacob for their assistance.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by a grant from DuPont de Numerous.
References
- 1.1. Lebeda A, Cohen Y (2011) Cucurbit downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis)-biology, ecology, epidemiology, host-pathogen interaction and control. Eur J Plant Pathol 129: 157–192. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Palti J, Cohen Y (1980) Downy mildew of cucurbits (Pseudoperonospora cubensis)—the fungus and its hosts, distribution, epidemiology and control. Phytoparasitica 8: 109–147. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cohen Y, Van den Langenberg KM, Wehner TC, Ojiambo PS, Hausbeck M, Quesada-Ocampo LM et al. (2015) Resurgence of Pseudoperonospora cubensis: The causal agent of cucurbit downy mildew. Phytopathology 105: 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ojiambo PS, Gent DH, Quesada-Ocampo LM, Hausbeck MK, Holmes GJ (2015) Epidemiology and population biology of Pseudoperonospora cubensis: A model system for management of downy mildews. Annu Rev Phytopathol 53: 11.11–11.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gisi U, Sierotzki H (2014) Mechanisms of resistance: Oomycete fungicides—Phenylamides, Quinone outside Inhibitors and Carboxylic Acid Amides In: Ishii H, Hollomon D, editors. Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens: Principles and a Guide to Practical Management. Japan: Springer; [Google Scholar]
- 6. Thornton AC, Holmes GJ, Adams ML (2005) Evaluation of fungicides for control of downy mildew of cucumber, 2004. Fungic Nematic Tests 60: V059. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Adams ML, Quesada-Ocampo LM (2014) Evaluation of fungicides for control of downy mildew on cucumber, Kinston 2013. Plant Dis Management Rep 8: V240. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hausbeck MK, Linderman SD (2014) Evaluation of fungicides for control of downy mildew of cucumber, 2013. Plant Dis Management Rep 8: V304. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hübschova J, Lebeda A (2010) Fungicide effectiveness on Czech populations of Pseudoperonospora cubensis . Acta Hort 871: 458–464. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pavelkova J, Lebeda A, Sedlakova B (2014) Efficacy of fosetyl-Al, propamocarb, dimethomorph, cymoxanil, metalaxyl and metalaxyl-M in Czech Pseudoperonospora cubensis populations during the years 2005 through 2010. Crop Protect 60: 9–19. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Reuveni M, Eyal H, Cohen Y (1980) Development of resistance to metalaxyl in Pseudoperonospora cubensis . Plant Dis 64: 1108–1109. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cohen Y, Coffey MD (1986) Systemic fungicides and the control of oomycetes. Ann Rev Phytopathol 24: 311–338. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lebeda A, Cohen Y (2012) Fungicide resistance in Pseudoperonospora cubensis, the causal agent of cucurbit downy mildew In: Thind TS, editor. Fungicide Resistance in Crop Protection:Risk and Management: CAB International; pp. 45–63. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cohen Y, Reuveni M, Samoucha Y (1983) Competition between metalaxyl-resistant and sensitive strains of Pseudoperonospora cubensis on cucumber plants. Phytopathology 73: 1516–1520. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Samoucha Y, Cohen Y (1984) Differential sensitivity to mancozeb of metalaxyl-sensitive and metalaxyl-resistant isolates of Pseudoperonospora cubensis . Phytopathology 74: 1437–1439. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Samoucha Y, Cohen Y (1985) Occurrence of metalaxyl-resistant isolates of Pseudoperonospora cubensis in Israel: a 5-year survey. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 15: 419–422. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hermann D, McKenzie D, Cohen Y, U G (2016) Phenylamides: Market trends and resistance evolution for important Oomycete pathogens 35 years after the first product introduction In: Stevenson KL, Wyenandt CA, McGrath ML, editors. Fungicide Resistance Development in North America. USA: APS Press. pp. In Press. [Google Scholar]
- 18.18. Ishii H, Fraaije BA, Sugiyama T, Noguchi K, Nishimura K, Takeda T et al. (2001) Occurrence and molecular characterization of strobilurin resistance in cucumber powdery mildew and downy mildew. Phytopathology 91: 1166–1171. 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.12.1166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Blum M, Waldner M, Olaya G, Cohen Y, Gisi U Sierotski H et al. (2011) Resistance mechanism to carboxylic acid amid (CAA) fungicides in the cucurbit downy mildew pathogen Pseudoperonospora cubensis . Pest Manag Sci 67: 1211–1214. 10.1002/ps.2238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sierotzki H, Blum M, Olaya G, Waldner-Zulauf M, Wullschleger J, Cohen Y et al. (2011) Sensitivity to CAA fungicides and frequency of mutations in cellulose synthase (CesA3) gene of oomycete pathogen populations In: Dehne HW, Deising HB, Gisi U, Kuck KH, Russel PE et al. , editors. Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds VI, Proc 16th Intern Reinhardsbrunn Symp. ed. Braunschweig, Germany: DPG Selbstverlag. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhu SS, Liu XL, Wang Y, Wu XH, Liu PF, Li JQ et al. (2007) Resistance of Pseudoperonospora cubensis to flumorph on cucumber in plastic houses. Plant Pathol 56: 967–975. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gold RE, Schiffer H, Speakman J, Stammler G, Klappach K, Brix HD et al. (2011) Initium—A new innovative fungicide for the control of Oomycetes in speciality crops In: Dehne HW, Deising HBK, Gisi U, Kuck HK, Russell PE et al. , editors. Modern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds VI 16th Intern Reinhardsbrunn Symp,. Braunschweig, Germany: DPG Spectrum Phytomedizin; pp. 55–61. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Fehr M, Wolf A, Stammler G (2015) Binding of the respiratory chain inhibitor Ametoctradin to mitochondrial bc1 complex. Pest Manag. Sci. 10.1002/ps.4031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhu X, Zhang M, Liu J, Ge J, Key GY (2015) Ametoctradin is a Potent Qo Site Inhibitor of the Mitochondrial Respiration Complex III. J Agric Food Chem 63: 3377–3386. 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sweigard JA, Andreassi J, Pember S, Gutteridge S, Pasteris R, Hanagan MA et al. (2014) Discovery of the target site of oxathiapiprolin (DuPont Zorvec disease control). 13th IUPAC Congress of Pesticide Chemistry, San Francisco, abstract Agro 911.
- 26. Patel JS, Zhang S, de Novaes MIC (2014) Oxathiapiprolin: An effective new chemistry for control of downy mildew of basil. Phytopathology 104: 90–90. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Patel JS, de Novaes MIC, Zhang S (2013) Management of downy mildew of basil by seed treatment with oxathiapiprolin. Phytopathology 103: 111–111. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ji P, Csinos AS, Hickman LL, Hargett U (2014) Efficacy and application methods of Oxathiapiprolin for management of black shank on tobacco. Plant Dis 98: 1551–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ji P, Csinos AS (2015) Effect of oxathiapiprolin on asexual life stages of Phytophthora capsici and disease development on vegetables. Ann App Biol 166: 229–235. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bittner R, Mila A (2014) In vitro studies of a novel fungicide against the black shank pathogen, Phytophthora nicotianae . Phytopathology 104: 15–15.23883155 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Matheron ME, Porchas M (2014) Relative ability of chemical management tools to inhibit stem lesion development on pepper plants inoculated with P. capsici . Phytopathology 104: 75–76.23883157 [Google Scholar]
- 32. Humann R, Johnson K, Gulya T, Meyer S, Jordahl J, Friskop A et al. (2014) Evaluation of oxathiapiprolin for management of downy mildew on sunflower. Phytopathology 104: 52–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cohen Y, Rubin AE, Galperin M, Jacob A. Oxathiapiprolin, a new fungicide active againstdowny mildews; 2015; Bet-Dagan, Israel. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cohen Y, Eyal H, Hanania J (1990) Ultrastructure, autofluorescence, callose deposition and lignification in susceptible and resistant muskmelon leaves infected with the powdery mildew fungus Sphaerotheca fuliginea . Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 36: 191–204. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Cohen Y, Eyal H, Hanania J, Malik Z (1989) Ultrastructure of Pseudoperonospora cubensis in muskmelon genotype susceptible and resistant to downy mildew. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 34: 27–40. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Cohen Y, Meron I, Mor N, Zuriel S (2003) A new pathotype of Pseudoperonospora cubensis causing downy mildew in cucurbits in Israel. Phytoparasitica 31: 458–466. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Holmes GJ, Wehner TC, Thornton A (2006) An old enemy re-emerges: downy mildew rears its ugly head on cucumber, impacting growers up and down the Eastern US American Vegetable Grower. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cohen Y, Rubin AE (2012) Mating type and sexual reproduction of Pseudoperonospora cubensis, the downy mildew agent of cucurbits. Eur J Plant Pathol 132: 577–592. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cohen Y, Rubin AE, Galperin M, Ploch S, Runge F, Thines M et al. (2014) Seed transmission of Pseudoperonospora cubensis . Plos One 9: e109766 10.1371/journal.pone.0109766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hermann D, McKenzie D, Cohen Y, U G (2014) Phenylamides: Market trends and resistance evolution for important Oomycete pathogens 35 years after the first product introduction In: Stevenson KL, Wyenandt CA, McGrath ML, editors. Fungicide Resistance Development in North America. USA: APS Press. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ojiambo PS, Paul PA, Holmes GJ (2010) A quantitative review of fungicide efficacy for managing downy mildew in cucurbits. Phytopathology (abstr) 100: 1066–1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cohen Y, Gisi U (2007) Differential activity of carboxylic acid amides fungicides against various developmental stages of Phytophthora infestans . Phytopathology 97: 1274–1283. 10.1094/PHYTO-97-10-1274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA (2010) The Diverse Functions of Oxysterol-Binding Proteins In: Schekman R, Goldstein L, Lehmann R, editors. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vol 26 pp. 157–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cohen Y, Rubin AE, Kilfin G (2010) Mechanisms of induced resistance in lettuce against Bremia lactucae by DL-beta-amino-butyric acid (BABA). Eur J Plant Pathol 126: 553–573. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Cohen Y, Reuveni M, Eyal H (1979) The systemic antifungal activity of Ridomil against Phytophthora infestans on tomato plants. Phytopathology 69: 645–649. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bittner R, Mila A (2014) Managing black shank of tobacco with a novel fungicide in on-farm studies. Phytopathology 104: 15–15.23883155 [Google Scholar]
- 47. Cohen Y, Gisi U (1993) Uptake, translocation and degradation of 14C-cymoxanil in tomato plants. Crop Prot 12: 284–292. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.