Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 30;232:4129–4157. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3938-6

Table 1.

PET studies examining the susceptibility of extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptor radioligands for manipulation by dopaminea

Receptor Radioligand Challenge Species Protocol Outcome parameter Effect on outcome parameter Reference
D2R [11C]FLB 457 Amphetamine (2 mg/kg i.v., 15 min and 3 h prior) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 3) B SBR ↓6–16 % and ↓2–16 % in neoCx and thalamusb (Chou et al. 2000)
[11C]FLB 457 Methamphetamine (1 mg/kg i.v., 15 min prior ) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 3) B BP ND ↓3–7 % in frontal Cx, thalamus, and temporal Cxb (Okauchi et al. 2001)
[11C]FLB 457 Nicotine (32 μg/kg + 0.8 μg/kg/min and 100 μg/kg + 2.53 μg/kg/min i.v., 30 min prior) and saline Monkey (n = 5 and 5 and 5) B V T NS (Tsukada et al. 2005a)
[11C]FLB 457 MK801 (0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg i.v., 30 min prior) vs. saline Monkey (n = 8) B V T NS, ↓∼15 % and ↓35 % in prefrontal Cx (Tsukada et al. 2005b)
[11C]FLB 457 Ketamine (200 ng/ml target in plasma i.v., 15 min prior to 89 min post) and control Human (n = 8 and 8) B BP ND ↓11 % in posterior cingulate Cx (Aalto et al. 2005)
[11C]FLB 457 Methylphenidate (40 and 60 mg p.o., 1 h prior) vs. placebo Human (n = 5 and 5) B V T ↓6–7 % in frontal Cx, temporal Cx, and thalamus (Montgomery et al. 2007)
BP ND NS
[11C]FLB 457 d-Amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg i.v., 5 min prior) and placebo Human (n = 12 and 11) B V T NS (Aalto et al. 2009)
BP ND ↓13 % in hippocampus and posterior cingulate
[11C]FLB 457 Amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg p.o., 3 h prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 12) B BP P ↓12 % in parietal Cx (Narendran et al. 2009)
BP ND ↓7–13 % in various regions
[11C]Fallypride BP P NS
BP ND ↓8 % in temporal Cx
[11C]FLB 457 α-Methyl-para-tyrosine (103–129 mg/kg p.o., over 2 days prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 6) B BP P NS (Frankle et al. 2010)
BP ND ↓9 % in temporal Cx
[11C]FLB 457 d-Amphetamine (0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg i.v., 30 min prior) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 7, 9, and 4) B BP ND ↓6 %, ↓16 %, and ↓24 % in frontal Cx (Narendran et al. 2014)
[11C]FLB 457 Amphetamine (0.4–0.5 mg/kg p.o., 3 h prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 6) B BP ND (2TC) NS (Sandiego et al. 2015)
BP ND (SRTM) ↓8–13 % in various regions
[18F]Fallypride d-Amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg i.v., 5 min prior) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 3) B BP ND ↓25–36 % in various regions (Slifstein et al. 2004)
d-Amphetamine (0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg i.v., 260 min post) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 2) BI ↓−1–14 % and ↓10–34 % in various regions
[18F]Fallypride Amphetamine (0.60 mg/kg i.v., 15–30 min prior) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 2) B BP ND ↓16–39 % in various regionsb (Mukherjee et al. 2005)
Amphetamine (1.13 mg/kg i.v., 15 min prior) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 1) BP ND ↓14–39 % in various regionsb
Amphetamine (0.70 mg/kg i.v., 45 min post) vs. baseline Monkey (n = 1) SBR ↓12–38 % in various regionsb
[18F]Fallypride d-Amphetamine (0.43 mg/kg p.o., 3 h prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 14) B BP ND ↓3–7 % in various regions (Riccardi et al. 2006)
[18F]Fallypride d-Amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg p.o., 3 h prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 14) B BP ND ↓8–13 % in various regions (Cropley et al. 2008)
α-Methyl-para-tyrosine (3 g/70 kg/day over 44 h) vs. baseline Human (n = 8) NS
[18F]Fallypride α-Methyl-para-tyrosine (71.4 mg/kg p.o., over 26 h prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 6) B BP ND ↑13 % in substantia nigra (Riccardi et al. 2008)
[18F]Fallypride d-Amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg i.v., 30 min prior) vs. baseline Human (n = 15) B BP P ↓11–70 % in various regions (Slifstein et al. 2010)
BP ND (SRTM) ↓4–13 % in various regions
[18F]Fallypride S-Ketamine (0.1 mg/kg bolus + 0.01 mg/kg/min i.v., 35 min prior to 30 min post) vs. placebo Human (n = 10) B BP ND NS (Vernaleken et al. 2013)

B bolus, BP ND binding potential non-displaceable, BP P binding potential plasma, Cx cortex, NS no statistically significant effect, SBR specific binding ratio, V T distribution volume

aThis table solely includes PET studies examining dopamine changes in extra-striatal regions. The authors refer the reader to a previous review article (Laruelle 2000) for a summary on studies examining striatal dopamine release

bNo statistical analysis reported